 |
|
|
|||||
President Donald Trump said Monday that hes deploying the National Guard across Washington and taking over the citys police department in the hopes of reducing crime, even as the citys mayor has noted that crime is falling in the nations capital. The Republican president, who said he was formally declaring a public safety emergency, compared crime in the American capital with that in other major cities, saying Washington performs poorly on safety relative to the capitals of Iraq, Brazil and Colombia, among others. Trump also said at his news briefing that his administration has started removing homeless encampments from all over our parks, our beautiful, beautiful parks. We’re getting rid of the slums, too, Trump said, adding that the U.S. would not lose its cities and that Washington was just a start. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi will be taking over responsibility for Washington’s metro police department, he said, while also complaining about potholes and graffiti in the city and calling them embarrassing. For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects a next step in his law enforcement agenda after his aggressive push to stop illegal border crossings. But the move involves at least 500 federal law enforcement officials as well as the National Guard, raising fundamental questions about how an increasingly emboldened federal government will interact with its state and local counterparts. Combating crime The president has used his social media and White House megaphones to message that his administration is tough on crime, yet his ability to shape policy might be limited outside of Washington, which has a unique status as a congressionally established federal district. Nor is it clear how his push would address the root causes of homelessness and crime. Trump said he is invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to deploy members of the National Guard. About 500 federal law enforcement officers are being tasked with deploying throughout the nations capital as part of the Trump administrations effort to combat crime, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on Monday. More than 100 FBI agents and about 40 agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are among federal law enforcement personnel being assigned to patrols in Washington, the person briefed on the plans said. The Drug Enforcement Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Marshals Service are also contributing officers. The person was not authorized to publicly discuss personnel matters and spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity. The Justice Department didnt immediately have a comment Monday morning. The National Guard Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, questioned the effectiveness of using the Guard to enforce city laws and said the federal government could be far more helpful by funding more prosecutors or filling the 15 vacancies on the D.C. Superior Court, some of which have been open for years. Bowser cannot activate the National Guard herself, but she can submit a request to the Pentagon. I just think thats not the most efficient use of our Guard, she said Sunday on MSNBC’s The Weekend, acknowledging it is “the presidents call about how to deploy the Guard. Bowser was making her first public comments since Trump started posting about crime in Washington last week. She noted that violent crime in Washington has decreased since a rise in 2023. Trump’s weekend posts depicted the district as one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the World.” For Bowser, Any comparison to a war-torn country is hyperbolic and false. Focusing on homelessness Trump in a Sunday social media post had emphasized the removal of Washingtons homeless population, though it was unclear where the thousands of people would go. The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY, Trump wrote Sunday. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you dont have to move out. Were going to put you in jail where you belong. Last week, the Republican president directed federal law enforcement agencies to increase their presence in Washington for seven days, with the option to extend as needed. On Friday night, federal agencies including the Secret Service, the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service assigned more than 120 officers and agents to assist in Washington. Trump said last week that he was considering ways for the federal government to seize control of Washington, asserting that crime was ridiculous and the city was unsafe, after the recent assault of a high-profile member of the Department of Government Efficiency. Crime statistics Police statistics show homicides, robberies and burglaries are down this year when compared with this time in 2024. Overall, violent crime is down 26% compared with this time a year ago. Trump offered no details in Truth Social posts over the weekend about possible new actions to address crime levels he argues are dangerous for citizens, tourists and workers alike. The White House declined to offer additional details about Monday’s announcement. The police department and the mayors office did not respond to questions about what Trump might do next. The president criticized the district as full of tents, squalor, filth, and Crime, and he seems to have been set off by the attack on Edward Coristine, among the most visible figures of the bureaucracy-cutting effort known as DOGE. Police arrested two 15-year-olds in the attempted carjacking and said they were looking for others. This has to be the best run place in the country, not the worst run place in the country, Trump said Wednesday. He called Bowser a good person who has tried, but she has been given many chances. Trump has repeatedly suggested that the rule of Washington could be returned to federal authorities. Doing so would require a repeal of the Home Rule Act of 1973 in Congress, a step Trump said lawyers are examining. It could face steep pushback. Bowser acknowledged that the law allows the president to take more control over the city’s police, but only if certain conditions are met. None of those conditions exist in our city right now,” she sai. We are not experiencing a spike in crime. In fact, were watching our crime numbers go down. David Klepper, Associated Press Associated Press writers Ashraf Khalil, Alanna Durkin Richer, and Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.
Category:
E-Commerce
Commercial fishing that recently resumed in a vast protected area of the Pacific Ocean must halt once again, after a judge in Hawaii sided this week with environmentalists challenging a Trump administration rollback of federal ocean protections. The remote Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument is home to turtles, marine mammals and seabirds, which environmental groups say will get snagged by longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 60 miles (about 100 kilometers) or longer. President Donald Trump’s executive order to allow this and other types of commercial fishing in part of the monument changed regulations without providing a process for public comment and rulemaking and stripped core protections from the monument, the groups argued in a lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Micah W. J. Smith granted a motion by the environmentalists on Friday. The ruling means boats catching fish for sale will need to immediately cease fishing in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles (93 kilometers to 370 kilometers) around Johnston Atoll, Jarvis Island and Wake Island, said Earthjustice, an environmental law organization representing the plaintiffs. U.S. Justice Department attorneys representing the government did not immediately return an email message seeking comment on Saturday. Trump has said the U.S. should be the worlds dominant seafood leader, and on the same day of his April executive order, he issued another one seeking to boost commercial fishing by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas. President George W. Bush created the marine monument in 2009. It consists of about 500,000 square miles (1.3 million square kilometers) in the remote central Pacific Ocean southwest of Hawaii. President Barack Obama expanded it in 2014. Soon after Trump’s executive order, the National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them the green light to fish commercially in the monument’s boundaries, Earthjustice’s lawsuit says. Fishing resumed within days, the group said. Government attorneys say the fisheries services letter merely notified commercial fishers of a change that had already taken place through Trumps authority to remove the prohibition on commercial fishing in certain areas. Earthjustice challenged that letter, and by granting the motion in their favor, the federal judge found the government had chosen not to defend its letter on the merits and forfeited that argument. Smith also ruled against the government’s other defenses, that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the letter and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. David Henkin, an Earthjustice attorney, said Smith’s ruling requires the government to go through a process to determine what kind of fishing, and under what conditions, can happen in monument waters in a way that wouldn’t destroy the area. Members of Hawaiis longline fishing industry say they have made numerous gear adjustments and changes over the years, such as circle hooks, to avoid that. The lawsuit says allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion would also harm the cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific. Jennifer Sinco Kelleher and Audrey McAvoy, Associated Press
Category:
E-Commerce
There’s a war brewing in the world of AI agents. After declaring a month ago that it would block AI crawlers by default on its network, Cloudflare openly accused Perplexity of deliberately bypassing internet standards to scrape websites. It published a detailed blog post, explaining how, even if its bots were blocked, Perplexity would use certain tacticsincluding third-party crawlersto access those websites anyway. Perplexity responded swiftly with its own post, pointing out that its use of third-party crawlers was actually significantly less than Cloudflare was saying. But the crux of Perplexity’s rebuttal was that Cloudflare fundamentally misunderstood its bot activity: because its agent bots act on behalf of specific user requestsand not crawling the web generallyPerplexity believes they should be able to access anything its human operator could. This divide gets right at the heart of how the AI internet works, and settling on a standard will be crucial to how agents, the media industry, and information retrieval in general will evolve. Notably, Perplexity didn’t deny that its agent bots bypass the Robots Exclusion Protocol (known as robots.txt) to access contentit instead said that behavior was justified: If you wouldn’t deny the content to a person, you should also provide it to a bot acting on behalf of that person. {"blockType":"creator-network-promo","data":{"mediaUrl":"https:\/\/images.fastcompany.com\/image\/upload\/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit\/wp-cms-2\/2025\/03\/mediacopilot-logo-ss.png","headline":"Media CoPilot","description":"Want more about how AI is changing media? Never miss an update from Pete Pachal by signing up for Media CoPilot. To learn more visit mediacopilot.substack.com","substackDomain":"https:\/\/mediacopilot.substack.com\/","colorTheme":"blue","redirectUrl":""}} On the web, nobody knows you’re a bot There are some nuanced but important aspects to this: Agent bots are different from AI training bots or search crawlers. They don’t scrape data to either train AI models or for a general search index. These bots go out and get data directly in response to a user query. When you, say, ask a chatbot what the hours are for your hairdresser, it sends a bot to go check the website right then and there. Once the data is delivered, it’s not stored in a general database, Perplexity says. As a user of AI, the difference isn’t obvious. When you ask a chatbot for any particular piece of information, it’s often not clear which parts of the answer are based on training data, search indexing, or agent activity. You just expect it to work, and to give you the best available information. A lot of the time, that means checking in real time with an external source, a trend that points toward a surge in AI bot activity as everyone starts sending agents to do their browsing for them. For agent-based web browsing to work, agents will need to have the same kind of access to the web that humans do. The problem, as I’ve articulated before, is that agents aren’t humans. A person visiting a website can be enticed by advertising, calls to action, or other content. Much of the economics of the web depends on this basic fact. Think about Google search results: What if you program agents to simply ignore all links marked “Sponsored”? Now, imagine if half of all web searches currently done by humans are performed by agents. You think Google might care? Until very recently, the web has run on human attention. But that is already shifting: Thanks to generative AI, more than half of web activity is now automated, according to Imperva, and that will certainly increase now that consumer agents like Perplexity’s Comet browser and ChatGPT Agent have arrived. The convenience of agent browsing is a game-changer: I’ve personally been using Comet for less than a month and it’s now my default browser. I routinely ask its built-in Assistant to perform tasks in the background. The more I use it, the more it’s difficult to deny that agents will be the future of the web. That is, as long as they can access it. And there’s good reason to deny them access, especially if your business model relies on humans interacting with your contenti.e. the entire media industry. Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince, in responding to discussion about the issue on X, seemed to say that blocking AI browsers like Comet is on the table, since they further blur the line between agent and user. The divided internet The question the Perplexity-Cloudflare conflict forces us to answer is: Who should have final say over access? Should a website be able to block user agents if they desire? Or should a person be able to send an agent on their behalf, and expect it to have the same level of access? A lot hinges on the answer to this. If users can employ agents as an unhindered proxy for their own browsing, as Perplexity defends, that’s sure to accelerate the shift to the internet of bots, and websites will need to contend with far fewer human visitors. A fairly reasonable assumption is it would also lead to a large expansion of hard paywalls as site owners seek to lock off or monetize access. Team Cloudflare, however, would prefer that sites have the ability to block agents specifically, bifurcating the experience between humans and bots, and the economics along with it. Charging bots to access content is a rapidly growing space, fueling a set of startups (including TollBit and ScalePost) as well as Cloudflare’s own Pay Per Crawl program. Although user agents aren’t the only type of bot, they might end up being the largest category, especially if AI browsers become popular. Ironically, it’s Perplexity who might have the best business model to deal with this future. The Perplexity Publishers’ Program, which shares ad revenue with content partners, is more scalable than signing individual deals with media companies, as OpenAI has done. The program is nascent, but if Perplexity could make it both available to any content creator and self-servesimiar to YouTube’s Partner Programperhaps it could provide the rails for monetizing the activity of agents. Either way, the economy of the web is going to be remade. We can see that the future is agents, but how the future sees them is a question that needs to be answered. And for the media, it might even be the most important one. {"blockType":"creator-network-promo","data":{"mediaUrl":"https:\/\/images.fastcompany.com\/image\/upload\/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit\/wp-cms-2\/2025\/03\/mediacopilot-logo-ss.png","headline":"Media CoPilot","description":"Want more about how AI is changing media? Never miss an update from Pete Pachal by signing up for Media CoPilot. To learn more visit mediacopilot.substack.com","substackDomain":"https:\/\/mediacopilot.substack.com\/","colorTheme":"blue","redirectUrl":""}}
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||