 |
|
|
|||||
A beloved Christmas tree tradition is returning to Manhattan for the holiday season next week. No, its not the towering spruce at Rockefeller Center, which is lit in early December. The comparatively smaller Origami Holiday Tree thats delighted crowds for decades at the American Museum of Natural History opens to the public on Monday. The colorful, richly decorated 13-foot (4-meter) tree is adorned with thousands of hand-folded paper ornaments created by origami artists from around the world. This years tree is inspired by the museums new exhibition, Impact: The End of the Age of Dinosaurs, which chronicles how an asteroid crash some 66 million years ago reshaped life on Earth. Talo Kawasaki, the trees co-designer, said the trees theme is New Beginnings, in reference to the new world that followed the mass extinction. Located off the museums Central Park West entrance, the artificial tree is topped with a golden, flaming asteroid. Its branches and limbs are packed with origami works representing a variety of animals and insects, including foxes, cranes, turtles, bats, sharks, elephants, giraffes and monkeys. Dinosaur favorites such as the triceratops and tyrannosaurus rex are also depicted in the folded paper works of art. We wanted to focus more not so much the demise of the dinosaurs, but the new life this created, which were the expansion and the evolution of mammals ultimately leading to humanity, Kawasaki explained on a recent visit. The origami tree has been a highlight of the museums holiday season for more than 40 years. Volunteers from all over the world are enlisted to make hundreds of new models. The intricate paper artworks are generally made from a single sheet of paper but can sometimes take days or even weeks to perfect. The new origami pieces are bolstered by archived works stored from prior seasons, including a 40-year-old model of a pterosaur, an extinct flying reptile, that was folded for one of the museums first origami trees in the early 1970s. Rosalind Joyce, the trees co-designer, estimates that anywhere from 2,000 to 3,000 origami works are embedded in the tree. This year theres a lot of stuff stuffed in there, she said. So I dont count. Joseph B. Frederick and Philip Marcelo, Associated Press
Category:
E-Commerce
A 1940 self-portrait by famed Mexican artist Frida Kahlo of her asleep in a bed could make history Thursday when it goes on sale by Sothebys in New York. With an estimated price of $40 million to $60 million, El sueo (La cama) in English, The Dream (The Bed) may surpass the top price for a work by any female artist when it goes under the hammer. That record currently stands at $44.4 million, paid at Sothebys in 2014 for Georgia OKeeffes Jimson Weed/White Flower No. 1. The highest price at auction for a Kahlo work is $34.9 million, paid in 2021 for Diego and I, depicting the artist and her husband, muralist Diego Rivera. Her paintings are reported to have sold privately for even more. The painting up for auction depicts Kahlo asleep in a wooden colonial-style bed, wrapped in a golden blanket embroidered with crawling vines and leaves. Above her, seemingly levitating atop the bedposts, lies a full-sized skeleton. In its catalog note, Sotheby’s said the painting offers a spectral meditation on the porous boundary between sleep and death. Last exhibited publicly in the late 1990s, the painting is the star of a sale of more than 100 surrealist works by artists including Salvador Dalí, René Magritte, Max Ernst, and Dorothea Tanning. They are from a private collection whose owner has not been disclosed. Kahlo vibrantly and unsparingly depicted herself and events from her life, which was upended by a bus accident at 18. She started to paint while bedridden, underwent a series of painful surgeries on her damaged spine and pelvis, then wore casts until her death in 1954 at age 47. The suspended skeleton is often interpreted as a visualization of her anxiety about dying in her sleep, a fear all too plausible for an artist whose daily existence was shaped by chronic pain and past trauma, the catalog notes.
Category:
E-Commerce
Theyre cute, even cuddly, and promise learning and companionshipbut artificial intelligence toys are not safe for kids, according to childrens and consumer advocacy groups urging parents not to buy them during the holiday season. These toys, marketed to kids as young as 2 years old, are generally powered by AI models that have already been shown to harm children and teenagers, such as OpenAIs ChatGPT, according to an advisory published Thursday by the childrens advocacy group Fairplay and signed by more than 150 organizations and individual experts such as child psychiatrists and educators. The serious harms that AI chatbots have inflicted on children are well-documented, including fostering obsessive use, having explicit sexual conversations, and encouraging unsafe behaviors, violence against others, and self-harm, Fairplay said. AI toys, made by companies such as Curio Interactive and Keyi Technologies, are often marketed as educational, but Fairplay says they can displace important creative and learning activities. They promise friendship but also disrupt childrens relationships and resilience, the group said. Whats different about young children is that their brains are being wired for the first time and developmentally it is natural for them to be trustful, for them to seek relationships with kind and friendly characters, said Rachel Franz, director of Fairplays Young Children Thrive Offline Program. Because of this, she added, the amount of trust young children are putting in these toys can exacerbate the harms seen with older children. Fairplay, a 25-year-old organization formerly known as the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, has been warning about AI toys for more than 10 years. They just werent as advanced as they are today. A decade ago, during an emerging fad of internet-connected toys and AI speech recognition, the group helped lead a backlash against Mattels talking Hello Barbie doll that it said was recording and analyzing childrens conversations. Everything has been released with no regulation and no research, so it gives us extra pause when all of a sudden we see more and more manufacturers, including Mattel, who recently partnered with OpenAI, potentially putting out these products, Franz said. Its the second big seasonal warning against AI toys since consumer advocates at U.S. PIRG last week called out the trend in its annual Trouble in Toyland report that typically looks at a range of product hazards, such as high-powered magnets and button-sized batteries that young children can swallow. This year, the organization tested four toys that use AI chatbots. We found some of these toys will talk in-depth about sexually explicit topics, will offer advice on where a child can find matches or knives, act dismayed when you say you have to leave, and have limited or no parental controls, the report said. One of the toys, a teddy bear made by Singapore-based FoloToy, was later withdrawn, its CEO told CNN this week. Dr. Dana Suskind, a pediatric surgeon and social scientist who studies early brain development, said young children don’t have the conceptual tools to understand what an AI companion is. While kids have always bonded with toys through imaginative play, when they do this they use their imagination to create both sides of a pretend conversation, practicing creativity, language, and problem-solving, she said. An AI toy collapses that work. It answers instantly, smoothly, and often better than a human would. We dont yet know the developmental consequences of outsourcing that imaginative labor to an artificial agentbut its very plausible that it undercuts the kind of creativity and executive function that traditional pretend play builds, Suskind said. Beijing-based Keyi, maker of an AI petbot called Loona, didnt return requests for comment this week, but other AI toymakers sought to highlight their child safety protections. California-based Curio Interactive makes stuffed toys, like Gabbo and rocket-shaped Grok, that have been promoted by the pop singer Grimes. Curio said it has meticulously designed guardrails to protect children and the company encourages parents to monitor conversations, track insights, and choose the controls that work best for their family. “After reviewing the U.S. PIRG Education Funds findings, we are actively working with our team to address any concerns, while continuously overseeing content and interactions to ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for children. Another company, Miko, based in Mumbai, India, said it uses its own conversational AI model rather than relying on general large language model systems such as ChatGPT in order to make its productan interactive AI robotsafe for children. We are always expanding our internal testing, strengthening our filters, and introducing new capabilities that detect and block sensitive or unexpected topics,” said CEO Sneh Vaswani. These new features complement our existing controls that allow parents and caregivers to identify specific topics theyd like to restrict from conversation. We will continue to invest in setting the highest standards for safe, secure and responsible AI integration for Miko products. Mikos products are sold by major retailers such as Walmart and Costco and have been promoted by the families of social media kidfluencers whose YouTube videos have millions of views. On its website, it markets its robots as Artificial Intelligence. Genuine friendship. Ritvik Sharma, the company’s senior vice president of growth, said Miko actually encourages kids to interact more with their friends, to interact more with the peers, with the family members etc. Its not made for them to feel attached to the device only. Still, Suskind and children’s advocates say analog toys are a better bet for the holidays. “Kids need lots of real human interaction. Play should support that, not take its place. The biggest thing to consider isnt only what the toy does; its what it replaces. A simple block set or a teddy bear that doesnt talk back forces a child to invent stories, experiment, and work through problems. AI toys often do that thinking for them,” she said. Heres the brutal irony: when parents ask me how to prepare their child for an AI world, unlimited AI access is actually the worst preparation possible. Barbara Ortutay and Matt O’Brien, AP technology writers
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||