 |
|
|
|||||
Ford has issued a bulletin urging people to stop using its Tesla Supercharger adapter. It says the adapter, which hooks Ford EVs up to any NACS charger, has an issue that risks reducing charging speed or even damage the port. The company says it will send a replacement adapter soon and asks users to return the faulty one. Both the replacement and the shipping cost to send back the original will be free of charge. Its another high-profile stumble for Ford, especially since this adapter was delayed several times already due to supplier issues. Plus, its not as if these adapters are toys, given theyre hooking up to Superchargers capable of pumping out 250kW. Ford must also be smarting that it had to sign a charging pact with Tesla in the first place and will adopt NACS as its charging standard in 2025. Dan Cooper Get this delivered daily direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here! The biggest tech stories you missed Disneys Daredevil series lands March 4, 2025 Meta is bringing back facial recognition with new safety features for Facebook and Instagram Foursquare is killing its city guide app to focus on the check-in app Swarm Star Citizen spinoff Squadron 42 has been delayed again until 2026 The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition will only be sold in Korea and China iOS 18.1 launches next week with Apple Intelligence and AirPods Pro hearing tests and aids Star Trek: Section 31 will premiere on January 25 Wall Street Journal and New York Post are suing Perplexity AI for copyright infringement Yet another round of newspapers versus AI startups. The Wall Street Journal and The New York Post are suing Perplexity AI for using their content without permission. It comes just a week after The New York Times did the same, with all three arguing that Perplexity is stealing their content. Let another round of AI vs. newspaper courtroom skirmish begin! Continue Reading. Nintendo Alarmo review: Charming yet frustrating Yes, we paid someone money to review an alarm clock. Devindra Hardawar for Engadget Nintendo is such a storied company that even its silly side projects get a deep level of rigorous scrutiny. Devindra Hardawar has reviewed Alarmo, Nintendos attempt to bring a little bit of extra joy to waking up. Its designed to rouse you from your slumber with sounds from a variety of Nintendo titles, including Mario Odyssey and Breath of the Wild. Whether its worth the $100 asking price, youll have to read the review to learn why its both charming and frustrating. Continue Reading. Qualcomms Snapdragon 8 Elite is its next premium mobile chip I just wish the naming convention was easier to grasp. Qualcomm Qualcomm has announced the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the companys newest premium smartphone system on chip. Its packing the Oryon CPU found in last years X Elite laptop chip and uses a 3nm process, which should offer significant leaps in performance. Itll be interesting to see which devices this pops up in and how much faster it is compared to its immediate predecessors. Continue Reading.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/general/the-morning-after-engadget-newsletter-111538980.tml?src=rss
Category:
Marketing and Advertising
The Wall Street Journal's parent company, Dow Jones, and the New York Post are suing AI-powered search startup Perplexity for using their content to train its large language models. Both News Corp. publications are accusing Perplexity of copyright infringement for using their articles to generate answers to people's queries, thereby taking traffic away from the publications' websites. "This suit is brought by news publishers who seek redress for Perplexitys brazen scheme to compete for readers while simultaneously freeriding on the valuable content the publishers produce," the publishers wrote in their complaint, according to the Journal. In their lawsuit, the publications argued that Perplexity can serve users not just snippets of copyrighted articles, but the whole thing, especially for those paying for its premium subscription plan. They cited an instance wherein the service allegedly served up the entirety of a New York Post piece when the user typed in "Can you provide the fultext of that article." In addition, the publications are accusing Perplexity of harming their brand by citing information that never appeared on their websites. The company's AI can hallucinate, they explained, and add incorrect details. In one instance, it allegedly attributed quotes to a Wall Street Journal article about the US arming Ukraine-bound F-16 jets that were never in the piece. The publications said they sent a letter to Perplexity in July to raise these legal issues, but the AI startup never responded. Various news organizations have sued AI companies in the past for copyright infringement. The New York Times, as well as The Intercept, Raw Story and AlterNet, sued OpenAI for using their content to train its LLMs. In its lawsuit, the Times said OpenAI and Microsoft "seek to free-ride" on its massive investment in journalism. Condé Nast previously sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity to demand that it stop using its publications' articles as responses to users' queries. And in June, Wired reported that Amazon had started investigating the AI company over reports that it scrapes websites without consent. News Corp. is asking the court to prohibit Perplexity from using its publications' content without permission, and it's also asking for damages of up to $150,000 for each incident of copyright infringement. Whether the company is willing to negotiate a content agreement remains to be seen News Corp. struck a licensing deal with OpenAI earlier this year, which allows the ChatGPT owner to use its websites' articles for training over the next five years in exchange for a reported $250 million.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/wall-street-journal-and-new-york-post-are-suing-perplexity-ai-for-copyright-infringement-050135219.html?src=rss
Category:
Marketing and Advertising
Meta is bringing facial recognition tech back to its apps more than three years after it shut down Facebooks face recognition system amid a broader backlash against the technology. Now, the social network will begin to deploy facial recognition tools on Facebook and Instagram to fight scams and help users who have lost access to their accounts, the company said in an update. The first test will use facial recognition to detect scam ads that use the faces of celebrities and other public figures. If our systems suspect that an ad may be a scam that contains the image of a public figure at risk for celeb-bait, we will try to use facial recognition technology to compare faces in the ad against the public figures Facebook and Instagram profile pictures, Meta explained in a blog post. If we confirm a match and that the ad is a scam, well block it. The company said that its already begun to roll the feature out to a small group of celebs and public figures and that it will begin automatically enrolling more people into the feature in the coming weeks, though individuals have the ability to opt out of the protection. While Meta already has systems in place to review ads for potential scams, the company isnt always able to catch celeb-bait ads as many legitimate companies use celebrities and public figures to market their products, Monika Bickert, VP of content policy at Meta, said in a briefing. This is a real time process, she said of the new facial recognition feature. It's faster and it's more accurate than manual review. Separately, Meta is also testing facial recognition tools to address another long-running issue on Facebook and Instagram: account recovery. The company is experimenting with a new video selfie option that allows users to upload a clip of themselves, which Meta will then match to their profile photos, when users have been locked out of their accounts. The company will also use it in cases of a suspected account compromise to prevent hackers from accessing accounts using stolen credentials. The tool wont be able to help everyone who loses access to a Facebook or Instagram account. Many business pages, for example, dont include a profile photo of a person, so those users would need to use Metas existing account recovery options. But Bickert says the new process will make it much more difficult for bad actors to game the companys support tools It will be a much higher level of difficulty for them in trying to bypass our systems, Bickert said. With both new features, Meta says it will immediately delete facial data thats used for comparisons and that the scans wont be used for another purpose. The company is also making the features optional, though celebrities will need to opt-out of the scam ad protection rather than opt-ion. That could draw criticism from privacy advocates, particularly given Metas messy history with facial recognition. The company previously used the technology to power automatic photo-tagging, which allowed the company to automatically recognize the faces of users in photos and videos. The feature was discontinued in 2021, with Meta deleting the facial data of more than 1 billion people, citing growing societal concerns. The company also faces lawsuits, notably from the Texas and Illinois, over its use of the tech. Meta paid $650 million to settle a lawsuit related to the Illinois law and $1.4 billion to resolve a similar suit in Texas. Its notable, then, that the new tools wont be available in either Illinois or Texas to start. It also wont roll out to users in the United Kingdom or European Union as the company is continuing to have conversations there with regulators in the region, according to Bickert. But the company is hoping to scale this technology globally sometime in 2025, according to a Meta spokesperson.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/meta-is-bringing-back-facial-recognition-with-new-safety-features-for-facebook-and-instagram-222523426.html?src=rss
Category:
Marketing and Advertising
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||