Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2025-02-05 14:42:04| Fast Company

In the first weeks of Donald Trumps second term in office, Elon Musk has been busy seizing control of instruments of government power, causing many to wonder who is really in charge. Elon Musk is President, The Atlantics Jonathan Lemire declared. There has never been a private citizen like him. Newly confirmed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently granted Musks Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to a highly sensitive computer systemdescribed as a a checkbook for the entire federal governmentthat distributes trillions of dollars annually. Musk, flanked by a cadre of young engineers with no government experience, as Wired has reported, are hacking away at sensitive federal systems likely without proper security clearance.  Naturally, Musk and his ragtag child army have raised bright red flags around Washington. So many of these things are so wildly illegal that I think theyre playing a quantity game and assuming the system cant react to all this illegality at once, Georgetown Law professor David Super told the Washington Post in response to Musks blitz on the federal government. Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden asked the Government Accountability Office on Tuesday to open an inquiry into Bessents granting DOGE access to the Treasury payment system. In a separate letter sent to Bessent last week, Wyden wrote, I can think of no good reason why political operators who have demonstrated a blatant disregard for the law would need access to these sensitive, mission-critical systems. But Wydens concern also highlighted another major conflict of interest that makes Musks powers worrying: his ties to China. I am concerned Musks enormous business operations in Chinaa country whose intelligence agencies have stolen vast amounts of sensitive data about Americans, including U.S. government employee data by hacking U.S. government systemsendangers U.S. cybersecurity and creates conflicts of interest that make his access to these systems a national security risk, he wrote. Wyden cited a recent Chinese breach of the Treasury Departments systems in which hackers accessed former Secretary Janet Yellens emails. While most American companies do notor cannotoperate in China, Musks Tesla certainly does. In 2024, the electric carmaker sold 657,000 cars in China, up 8.8% from the year before. It also operates massive car and battery manufacturing facilities in Shanghai. The company received several unusual concessions from the Chinese government, Wyden noted, letting Tesla operate independently without a joint venture with a Chinese partner, favorable loans, and a discounted corporate tax rate of 15% in China, something that could change quickly if Musk were to anger the Chinese government. In January, Chinese Vice President Han Zheng met with Musk, urging Tesla and other U.S. companies to seize the opportunity and share in the fruits of China’s development. Musk vowed to deepen investment cooperation with China. And with Musk helming the dissolution of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the agency in charge of foreign aid and assistance, critics have warned that Americas retreat could create pathways for China to expand its influence abroad. The Trump administration has just put America last, while handing a gift to our biggest adversaries, notably China, Michael Schiffer, former USAID assistant administrator in Asia, wrote in Just Security. Americas alliances will suffer. U.S. partners will be at risk. And Americas enemies will rejoice. With the U.S. and China on the brink of exacerbating its ongoing trade war, the man running behind the scenes and fiddling with the bells, knobs, and whistles of the U.S. government has no electoral mandate, no real position, no proper security clearance, and deep conflicts of interest with his business. What could go wrong?


Category: E-Commerce

 

LATEST NEWS

2025-02-05 14:00:00| Fast Company

Amid higher costs, longer wait times, and waning sales, Starbucks is ready for a brand refresh. The companys new CEO, Brian Niccol joins Rapid Response to reveal how Starbucks plans to go back to its roots prioritizing human connection and a local coffeehouse feel in the hopes of restoring the brands position in U.S. culture. Also, Niccol gives an inside look at the companys subtle name change, which aligns with this new strategy.  This is an abridged transcript of an interview from Rapid Response, hosted by the former editor-in-chief of Fast Company Bob Safian. From the team behind the Masters of Scale podcast, Rapid Response features candid conversations with todays top business leaders navigating real-time challenges. Subscribe to Rapid Response wherever you get your podcasts to ensure you never miss an episode. You’ve called your strategy ‘Back to Starbucks,’ and it’s included the return of a condiment station, the return of handwritten names on cups. It can sound like a lot of small details. Is that all that’s requiredtuning the details? Look, I mean, we are in the retail business. We’re in the customer service business, and anybody that’s been involved with that knows the details do matter. And the reason why the details you just mentioned really matter for Starbucks is, frankly, those details are our point of difference. It’s how we get to another level of connection. It’s also how we kind of create a little bit of the magic, right? What turns the coffee and that craft beverage into something really special is the moment that potentially you have in our store, the community of the store, the moment you might have with our barista, or just the moment where you grab your cup and unexpectedly there’s a little smiley face on your cup. And it just changes the entire attitude of the customer. Obviously, you have to have a great product, you have to have a great experience, but if you have those little moments of connection, it just adds so much more. Well, it’s always interesting how, in food-related businesses, the product has to be satisfying, but so much of it is about the experience, about getting the experience to feel memorable and satisfying. Yeah, that’s right. And look, I think one of the things that veered Starbucks a little bit off was the whole mobile ordering, the COVID situation. I think it just really took a lot of the soul out of what this business is all about. And I’m sure, Bob, like me, you remember when the first Starbucks came to the neighborhood, and it was a moment for the neighborhood, right? I was living in Cincinnati, Ohio. I was working at Procter & Gamble at the time, and we were like, what a great spot. I really loved it when they were like, all right, Brian, grande Americano with an extra shot. And I’m like, yeah, all right, that’s me. I’m in. So, I think just what happened with mobile ordering is it kind of chipped away at a little bit of that soul and that connection because we went to labels and we stopped writing on the cups and we started looking at how you can remove seconds from the proposition as opposed to how you maintain the experience, the connection, and the integrity of what goes even beyond a great cup of coffee. There is this kind of impression that there was an earlier Starbucks heyday, but it’s not like the stock is that far from its all-time high. So, when you think of the life cycle of the company, what phase do you feel like it’s in? Or do you see phases ahead? Right now, the phase we’re in is we need to get things turned around, at least in the U.S. business. We need to get what I would call the soul of the business back, this connection back, and the partner experience back so that the customer feels the brand again, okay? And I think when we get that back, there’s tremendous growth ahead of us because, frankly, the reality is so many things isolate you as opposed to bringing you together. And I think people want to get out of the loneliness phase and get back to the connection phase. I’ve had the opportunity to travel around the world, and it’s true everywhere I’ve been, whether it was Italy, which was a little bit surreal because the whole Starbucks original idea came from Howard visiting Italy. Here I am back in Milan, seeing people walk around with Starbucks cups. And it just demonstrates this is one of those human truths that just connects people all around the world, connecting over a cup of coffee or connecting with your barista. It’s just a human truth. You mentioned Howard Schultz, the founder and multiple-time CEO there. Do you talk with him about what you’re doing, or are you kind of on your own? Howard’s been great. I think I’m fortunate that you still have a founder who can share the history of how Starbucks went from one store in Seattle to the iconic global brand it is. He doesn’t want to run the company. He doesn’t want to be involved in the day-to-day. He wants you to do that. But he’s available for me to inquire about his thinking when you introduced food into the cafe and how it competed with coffee, and ‘what was your thinking when we went from hot to cold,’ and it’s great to get that insight. During Starbucks’ life, there’s been an increasing proliferation of neighborhood coffeehouses. How much do you think about these hyper-local cafes as your competition? I was watching your new commercial, “That’s not my name.” And it ends with a tweaked name for you guys, a Starbucks Coffee Company, which sounds a little more local. Is that what you’re trying to signify? The reality is, Starbucks started as a coffee company, and at the heart, that’s what we are. Again, I went back and did a little history lesson, and when Starbucks first started, it had a very simple statement to be the purveyor of the finest coffee in the world. And we still believe that in a really big way. So I think it’s important to make that statement that we are the Starbucks Coffee Company. And what I want people to understand is we are so committed to coffee quality that we apply that same commitment of quality and craft to the food we do, the teas we might provide, but first and foremost, we’re a coffee company. And I think it’s important for people to be reintroduced to Starbucks from that point of view because I think we’ve forgotten to tell people that over the last, let’s call it last decade. I mean, it sounds like you need to focus more. Now you need to narrow down a little bit what you’re doing, get a little more streamlined. And then maybe once that is ligned, you could start adding things back again or adding new things. We’re going to continue to be an innovative company, but you’re best served to innovate when your core is strong. If you are innovating to try and compensate for a weak core, usually good things don’t happen. You end up just drifting. And my point is let’s have a strong, healthy core, and then we can innovate from there.


Category: E-Commerce

 

2025-02-05 13:57:10| Fast Company

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Wednesday designed to prevent people who were biologically assigned male at birth from participating in women’s or girls’ sporting events.The order, which Trump is expected to sign at an afternoon ceremony, marks another aggressive shift by the president’s second administration in the way the federal government deals with transgender people and their rights.The president put out a sweeping order on his first day in office last month that called for the federal government to define sex as only male or female and for that to be reflected on official documents such as passports and in policies such as federal prison assignments.Trump found during the campaign that his pledge to “keep men out of women’s sports” resonated beyond the usual party lines. More than half the voters surveyed by AP VoteCast said support for transgender rights in government and society has gone too far.He leaned into the rhetoric before the election, pledging to get rid of the “transgender insanity,” though his campaign offered little in the way of details.Wednesday’s orderwhich coincides with National Girls and Women in Sports Daywill involve how his administration will interpret Title IX, the law best known for its role in pursuing gender equity in athletics and preventing sexual harassment on campuses.“This executive order restores fairness, upholds Title IX’s original intent, and defends the rights of female athletes who have worked their whole lives to compete at the highest levels,” said U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina.Every administration has the authority to issue its own interpretations of the landmark legislation. The last two presidential administrationsincluding Trump’s firstoffer a glimpse at the push-pull involved.Betsy DeVos, the education secretary during Trump’s first term, issued a Title IX policy in 2020 that narrowed the definition of sexual harassment and required colleges to investigate claims only if they’re reported to certain officials.The Biden administration rolled back that policy last April with one of its own that stipulated the rights of LGBTQ+ students would be protected by federal law and provided new safeguards for victims of campus sexual assault. The policy stopped short of explicitly addressing transgender athletes. Still, more than a half-dozen Republican-led states immediately challenged the new rule in court.“All Trump has to say is, ‘We are going to read the regulation traditionally,'” said Doriane Lambelet Coleman, a professor at Duke Law School.How this order could affect the transgender athlete populationa number that is incredibly difficult to pin downis uncertain.The Associated Press reported in 2021 that in many cases, the states introducing a ban on transgender athletes could not cite instances where their participation was an issue. When Utah state legislators overrode a veto by Gov. Spencer Cox in 2022, the state had only one transgender girl playing in K-12 sports who would be affected by the ban. It did not regulate participation for transgender boys.“This is a solution looking for a problem,” Cheryl Cooky, a professor at Purdue University who studies the intersection of gender, sports, media and culture, told the AP after Trump was elected.Yet the actual number of transgender athletes seems to be almost immaterial. Any case of a transgender female athlete competingor even believed to be competingdraws outsized attention, from Lia Thomas swimming for the University of Pennsylvania to the recently completed season of the San Jose State volleyball team. AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports Will Graves, AP National Writer


Category: E-Commerce

 

Latest from this category

05.02Walmart to cut jobs amid a changing retail landscape
05.02Californias insurance crisis means L.A. wildfire survivors have wildly unequal rebuilding challenges
05.02Bidens record debt forgiveness barely made a dent in the $1.7 trillion student loan crisis. Heres why
05.02Chipotle adds hundreds of new restaurants in record-breaking year
05.02AI might run your next employee training
05.02From Amazon conservation to cocaine crackdowns: Heres how dismantling the USAID impacts Latin America
05.02Chinas DeepSeek web version is raising security alarms. Heres why
05.02USAID staff ordered off the job worldwide by the Trump administration 
E-Commerce »

All news

05.02The Super Bowl is being broadcast with Dolby Atmos audio for the first time
05.02Mid-Day Market Internals
05.02Walmart to cut jobs amid a changing retail landscape
05.02Californias insurance crisis means L.A. wildfire survivors have wildly unequal rebuilding challenges
05.02Bidens record debt forgiveness barely made a dent in the $1.7 trillion student loan crisis. Heres why
05.02Chipotle adds hundreds of new restaurants in record-breaking year
05.02Amazon is holding a devices event on February 26
05.02Uptown residents breathe sigh of relief after Heartland Housings Leland Apartments gets reprieve from the auction block
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .