 |
|
|
|||||
Your colleagues decide in less than a minute whether your email is worth replying to. Microsofts 2025 Work Trend Index Report shows that the average employee receives 117 emails a day, and most are skimmed in under 60 seconds. In other words, if your email takes someone more than a minute to understand, theres a strong chance you wont be getting a timely response. Well-written emails dont just make you sound smarter; studies show that they also reduce misunderstandings and speed up responses. Here are five simple ways to get faster email responses, while also helping your recipient preserve mental energy and time. BREAK UP WITH THE EMAIL BRICK Long blocks of text are the enemy of attention. Research shows that visually uncluttered text (with white space and intentional spacing) is easier for busy readers to scan and digest quickly. Simply formatting your email with bullet points, bold text for important questions or updates, and short paragraphs will significantly increase your chances of getting a prompt response. Structure is just as important as length. If the email is longer than this article, consider your reader overwhelmed. DONT LEAD WITH SMALL TALK One of the biggest mistakes professionals make is burying the lead. Instead of opening with a short anecdote or unrelated small talk (Hope your week is going well), start with the purpose of your email, and ideally, the action you need. In military and executive communication, this is known as BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front). BLUF requires you to put key information, like the request or decision needed, in the first sentence or two. After you have led with the key information, you can share further details that the recipient can read if they need background context. And yes, you can still ask your coworker if they have plans for the weekend or how their dog is doing. But for the sake of everyones sanity, leave this to the end. DONT PLAY EMAIL TENNIS The back-and-forth dance of unanswered questions (When works for you?, Morning works, What time?) costs time and demands cognitive switching. One survey of modern workplace behavior found that knowledge workers spend roughly 28% of their workweek managing email, with a large portion of that time simply waiting on or chasing down replies. To reduce this, try to include all relevant details on the first send. One way to address this is, if youre proposing a meeting, include your availability windows, the purpose of the call, and how long you expect it to take in a single message. If you want a call back, include your direct phone number rather than waiting for the other person to ask. Write a clear subject line In a crowded inbox, the subject line acts as a decision filter: Is this relevant? Is this urgent? Can this wait? Studies show that email subject lines critically influence whether a recipient opens, defers, or ignores an email (before theyve read a single sentence of the message).Do your best to craft a subject lines that are specific, concise, and action-oriented. For example, Budget Review Needed by 3 PM is more effective than a generic phrase like Quick Question. BUILD EMAIL TRUST If you teach people over time that your emails are concise and to the point, you are building email trust. This means that recipients are more likely to respond positively and quickly when they see your name. Researchers in written communication emphasize that consistency in formatting and clarity doesnt just improve readability, it builds an implicit reputation for professionalism. Getting faster email replies isnt about sounding smarter. Its about making decisions easier for the person on the other side of the screen. When your emails are clear, scannable, and consistent, you reduce mental load, build trust, and teach people to respond to you faster.
Category:
E-Commerce
What do you envision when you think of meekness? You probably see a mousy doormat, someone sheepishly acquiescing to the will of the stronger. When Jesus says, Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth, you might think that those wimps will hand it over without a whimper or word of objection to stronger, more ambitious people. The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche called meekness craven baseness. Indeed, one of the Oxford English Dictionarys definitions is inclined to submit tamely to oppression or injury, easily imposed upon or cowed, timid. Meekness, then, is a weakness. Why would you ever want to be meek? The same goes for docility, often characterized as a near neighbor of meekness. We can get a feel for its usage these days from the Corpus of Contemporary American English, where one finds that a docile person is slow, controllable, obedient, submissive, compliant, passive, and under control. Or consider condescension. You likely envision someone self-important looking down her nose at a service worker, or some insufferable prig unwilling to come off his high horse to mingle with the peasants. Being condescending, far from being a virtue, is universally acknowledged as a vice. Meekness, docility, and condescension: three traits with no cultural capital today. And yet, our ancestors typically understood these traits to be virtues. How in the world could that be? As any philosopher will tell you, in a case of seeming disagreement, you need to settle the definitions of the words in play. How many arguments have been abruptly dissolved by someone saying, Oh, thats what you mean? When we check the meaning of these three terms, I think we come to see that theres been a switcheroo. As Ive found in my philosophical research and teaching, some of the virtues that were most celebrated in yesteryear but now go undersung are traits that can help us lead good lives, even now. Forgotten virtues Consider meeknessbut allow me to start with a little vignette. In 2018, mixed-martial-arts champion Matt Serra was having a family meal in a restaurant when a belligerent drunken man entered, threatening servers and patrons. Serra could have knocked him out cold. But instead, he calmly pinned him, waiting for security to arrive. A similar trait is on display when exasperated parents react with control, harried teachers dont rise to students provocations, and police de-escalate situations. In each case, they kept control of their emotions, especially their anger. One common feature of these stories is that the person wasnt powerless; rather, it was precisely because they understood how much power they had that they used restraint. Such a traitexcellence with respect to ones angerused to be called meekness. We hear an echo of this original meaning even today in horse training, where to meek a horse means training it to subjugate its great power to its master, not letting its passions take control. Likewise, meekness once meant not becoming weak, but subjugating power to reasonnot letting anger take control. In the Gospels, when Jesus calls himself meek, it is the same Greek word used for a meek horse: praus. A horse is not weaker on account of being meeked; no Greek warrior wanted a wimpy steed. The horse retains its strength, now safeguarded by self-control. This is quite a different notion of meekness than we find in our contemporary lexicon. Yet in its traditional sense, the word names a trait almost everyone deeply values. No one wants her best friend, child, teacher, coach, or deputy to be unable to control her anger. Such control is an important character trait for living a good life, but we no longer have a concept for it. What term do people use today for being disposed to pick battles prudently, not letting anger cloud ones judgment, not being easily baited into action theyll come to regretwithout being easily biddable or callous to real injustices? Self-control, a broad category that covers facing temptations, enduring difficulties and myriad things in between, is too broad a notion to do the work. Nor do we have a word for someone excellent at receiving instruction and insightsbut at the same time whos unafraid to think for herself, to disregard the advice of a snake-oil salesman. That used to be called docility. Condescension, the most surprising of the three, now suggests someone deigning to speak down from their lofty height. Yet it once described excellence at respecting people, regardless of their social status: easily connecting with those on a lower rung so they feel seen and valued, but without causing embarrassment or awkwardness. What term do we have now for inculcating such an important trait? Why words matter To be clear, Im not here from the Language Reclamation League. Im not necessarily advocating for a return to older languageand certainly not just because it is older. But without replacements for ethical concepts weve lost, were faced with a moral void, unable even to conceptualize the goodness that we want to see in ourselves and those we love. Maybe you think that not much is lost. Bridges fall when engineers cant distinguish varieties of physical strength; whats lost if people cant distinguish varieties of character strength? To my mind, there are at least three reasons why it is important to have some term or other for these traits. First, theres good psychological evidence that goals of approachI want to get healthy, I want to get financially stableare a stronger motivation for us than avoidance goalsI want to stop being sick, I want not to be poor. Approach goals typically yield more effort, more satisfaction, and more well-being. But they require naming the moral virtue you want to cultivate. Second, the positive traits named by these old virtues are what you really want. You dont merely want your loved ones to stop acting out of wrath. You want them to be able to restrain their power in the face of their anger. You are ignorant of your real goal if you dont have a concept for it. Third, consider the detriment caused by not having shared language for an ethical concept. The philosopher Miranda Fricker has written of the time before the term sexual harassment was coined in 1975. She provides multiple instances of women being wronged in the workplace but being unable to articulate that wrong to those in power, owing to a lack of a shared label for it. And not only that, but the lack of an adequate concept preventd the victims from fully understanding the wrong themselves. Having positive concepts for the traits we want to enable in ourselves and others is essential, then, to the moral life. The fact that weve let several go the way of blatherskite and bumfuzzled is telling. We still have terms for a bloviating windbag or being bewildered, so we dont need those archaic, though admittedly fun, words to express important truths. But when it comes to undersung virtues, we do need some way to highlight character traits that help form us into our best selveseven if the words of yesteryear no longer fit the bill. Timothy J. Pawl is a professor of philosophy at the University of St. Thomas. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Category:
E-Commerce
The devil mightve worn Prada in 2006, but two decades later, the fashion elite are wearing books. Case in point: Coachs hot new accessory is a keychain made out of literal hardcovers. Coach revealed the new book charms in a series of social posts on February 25. Created in collaboration with the publisher Penguin Random House, the charms include adorably teeny, fully readable versions of classics like Sense and Sensibility by Jane Austen and I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou, alongside more recent titles like Untamed by Glennon Doyle and A Forest of Wool and Steel by Natsu Miyashita. The book bag charms will be available for $95 on the Coach website in early March. [Photo: Courtesy of Penguin Random House x Coach] The charms represent an evolution of a broader trend: Physical books are making a comeback, both in the cultural zeitgeist and in the fashion world. Gen Zers are flocking to reading as a hobby, largely driven by online communities like BookTok and BookTube. Meanwhile, interest in the craft behind physical media is on the rise as more and more daily tasks shift online in the AI era. These converging winds are turning the humble book into a kind of intellectual status symbolone that can be worn as a bag, toted around as part of a performative male ensemble, or, in Coachs world, converted into a charming keychain. Why the hot new accessory is a book It would be difficult to miss the recent resurgent cultural interest in reading. Since 2023, Barnes & Noble has staged a massive comeback, which it attributes in large part to Gen Zs online communities. BookTok and BookTube are driving interest in genres like romance and fantasy, while celebrity book clubs like Dua Lipas Service95, Kaia Gerbers Library Science, and Reese Witherspoons Reeses Book Club are making reading an aspirational hobby. Inevitably, this trend has spilled over into fashion. In 2024, Saint Laurent opened its own bookshop. Last year, brands including Prada, Miu Miu, and Valentino all hosted literary-themed events or campaigns. And in January, Dior launched an extremely Instagrammable line of tote bags inspired by books. The brand advertised the bags with an Instagram Reel highlighting their detailed manufacturing process, drawing a clear parallel between the physical craft of bag-making and the intellectual craft of literature. Shan Yichun [Photo: Courtesy of Penguin Random House x Coach] Coach, it seems, is attempting something similar. In a press release, CMO Joon Silverstein explained that the concept for the brands book charms came from the insight that in a world shaped by fragmentation and digital overload, many Gen Zers are turning to long-form storytelling as a kind of refuge. “The future of brand building isnt about broadcasting messages. Its about building cultural relevance through participation, Silverstein told Fast Company, noting that Coach shaped the campaign with collaborators who “helped define the insight, craft the narrative, select the books at its core, and determine how it shows up across culture. (It also features Gen Z spokespeople such as the WNBAs Paige Bueckers, Oscar-nominated actress Elle Fanning, Emmy-winning actress Storm Reid, and Chinese pop singer Shan Yichun, among others.) [Photo: Courtesy of Penguin Random House x Coach] How book and accessories design team up To design the actual charms, Coach prioritized selecting books across a range of topics and aesthetics to capture different readers. While the first consideration was the stories themselves, cover designs were also a factor. Since the books were destined to be charms, the team tended to prefer bold colors and visually forward, distinctive designs that would be eye-catching at a glance ( la BookTok). Each charm has a colorful leather spine embossed with the Coach logo: The cool-toned image of a planned community on Celeste Ngs Little Fires Everywhere, for example, is complemented with a deep green; while Camryn Garretts rainbow-hued Friday Im in Love cover pops with a rich navy. Gold hardware (a loop and clip) makes each piece easily attachable to a purse or backpack. And to clarify, these charms are fully readable, miniature booksnot just inspired by them. Adam Royce, executive creative director at Penguin Random House, tells Fast Company that the project represents a broader shift in how people engage with books. For many readers, storytelling is part of how they signal identity and values, he explains. Partnering with Coach allows us to bring books into a space where personal expression is already central. In 2026, reading isn’t just a pastime. It’s a statement piece.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||