 |
|
|
|||||
Lurking on sites like LinkedIn and Indeed, or among your incoming text messages and emails, lies yet another disappointment to dodge in the already lacking job market: fake recruiters. Posing as representatives from top companies, theyll contact you out of the blue, offering a job so tempting, that 40% of targets ignore the warning signs and move forward with the interview. More than half of them, 51%, end up being scammed to give up personal data or money. Those findings came from a survey of more than 1,200 U.S. job seekers published in October by Password Manager. The prevalence of fake recruiters came to my attention several years ago, says Gunnar Kallstrom, the cybersecurity expert who conducted survey for the company, which reviews password manager apps. Since then, the number of fake recruiters has been on the rise . . . posing as recruiters for well-known companies. Per the survey, those companies include Amazon, Google, FedEx, UPS, Walmart, Apple, and Facebook (identified that way instead of by Meta in the survey), in that order of frequency. These scams pose real risks for the job seekers who fall for them. Fake recruiters steal Social Security numbers, bank information, and passwords in a variety of ways, some sneakier, or more sophisticated, than others. The Better Business Bureaus 2024 Scam Risk Tracker Report puts the median dollar loss at $1,500 for victimsno small sum, especially considering that these people are likely out of work. Not only do they result in material losses; they also put a serious dent in morale for those on the employment hunt. More than half of Password Manager survey respondents said theyre now less trusting of job opportunities and find the process more stressful40% say theyve even let legitimate posts pass them by, too concerned that theyre being tricked again. The trend is a nuisance at best; an active threat at worst. Still, false job recruiters have many tells that job seekers can use to spot them. Enterprises, too, have become increasingly aware of these scammers tactics. Representatives from some of the companies that fake recruiters most frequently impersonate told Fast Company exactly what job seekers should watch for to avoid falling victim to these insidious hiring scams. What is the MO of false recruiters? Generally, fake recruiters operate exactly like a social engineering campaign, says Kallstrom, in which their MO is to create a sense of urgency, legitimacy, and promise of reward for their victims. Those surprise text messages you receive saying your resume caught a recruiters eye, but the post theyre hiring for needs to be filled ASAP? Dont give it a second look. We simply do not do anything to create an undue sense of urgency, says Brian Ong, vice president of recruiting at Google. Hes heard from Google job candidates and employees about people falsely posing as members of the companys recruiting team, sending direct messages and emails even to those who havent previously applied for jobs at Google. Theyll use emails or websites, Ong adds, that look like they belong to Google, often using the companys logo. Weve also seen situations where these scams are using our name and brand to ask for money or an immediate in-person interview, says Ong, Both of which are misrepresentative of our hiring process. Amazon, meanwhile, has noticed customers reporting an increase in scammers pretending to be Amazon recruiters in September and October 2025, says Scott Knapp, the companys vice president of worldwide buyer risk prevention. These recruiters will ask for information like SSNs, bank information, or Amazon account detailsall information real recruiters for the company wouldnt solicit. At Target, No. 9 on Password Managers list of most-impersonated companies, the scams tend to focus on secret shopper opportunities, per the companys website. Via emails with subject lines like job offer or influencer opportunities, scammers will offer free products or cash in exchange for recipients buying items to review online, or for purchasing gift cards and sharing the cards information with the false Target reps. Tactics vary based on the type of company scammers are impersonating, adapting to whatever feels normal for that brand, Kallstrom says. FedExs fake delivery job offers will arrive via text: Urgent hiring needno interview required, Kallstrom says, a likely enough assertion since delivery companies tend to bring on seasonal employees for busy times, like holidays, without asking for extensive interviews or experience. For Meta, on the other hand, since they are a tech company, there may be a fake HR portal, software skills assessments, and fake interviews, adds Kallstrom, who describes tech company hiring scams as more sophisticated. They may entail full-on skills tests for software engineers that include coding challenges, through which scammers end up downloading malware onto the coders computer. The high salaries these fake recruiters offer may also cause applicants to let their guard down, Kallstrom says, because they are enticed by the money. Across the board, these companies are chosen by scammers because of their name recognition, says Kallstrom: They make great bait for a potential unsuspecting victim. How do you spot a recruiter impersonator? Any request for personal information is likely a sign of a scam, Googles Ong says, adding that candidates whove applied to Google jobs have already shared information like email addresses and phone numbers. Real recruiters shouldnt be asking for thoseespecially not alongside an invitation to a Google Meet or link to a login page where users need to input that information to sign in. Scammer tells will also appear in their own email addresses. Ong says he and his colleagues have seen fake recruiters with incomplete websites or misspelled emails along with outreach from people who do not have Google in their title or email. Misspellings, poor grammar, and inconsistencies in general could indicate an impersonator. Emails or websites replete with stock photos, too, should warrant a side-eye. As obvious as it may sound, any job opportunity that comes with an ask for payment should be avoidedeven if its indirect payment, like requesting you purchase a gift card. Amazon will never ask you to provide payment information, including gift cards (or verification cards, as some scammers call them) for products or services, says Knapp. Ultimately, if youre unsure whether a job opportunity is a scam, check the companys website. Companies tend to list their job openings online. Both Google and Amazon representatives point to their companies online job boards, where those whove received offers to apply for jobs can cross-check that those posts indeed appear on their websites. Job seekers can also do due diligence on the alleged recruiters doing outreach. Verify the contact by checking the email addresses, Ong says, looking up the person online, such as on LinkedIn. And if something does seem suspicious, flag it to the outlet where it was received. What to do if youve been targeted? The first step is to report it. The more consumers report scams to us, the better our tools get at identifying bad actors so that we can take action against them and protect consumers, says Knapp, pointing out Amazons scams help page where those targeted can report. The company works with consumer groups like the National Cybersecurity Alliance and the Better Business Bureau to create awareness campaigns about the latest, most common scams. Amazon also partners with law enforcement across the globe, Knapp adds, to hold scammers accountable, having initiated takedowns of more than 55,000 phishing websites and 12,000 phone numbers being used as part of impersonation schemes in 2024. A representative from Target says that cybersecurity experts from the companys Cyber Fusion Center use advanced tools and training to prevent and address potential threats. That includes tools developed by the company as part of an open source initiative on GitHub, like one that scans files, such as emails, to detect possible malicious activity. Anyone can get baited on social media or get a text about a job opportunity thats too good to be true, says Knapp. If something seems too good to be true, it likely is an impersonation scam.
Category:
E-Commerce
We talk about time at work as if its a fixed resource: something outside of us and something we either manage well or never have enough of. People genuinely believe the clock is the problem. But the more you look at how the brain processes experience, the less true this becomes. People dont feel pressured because they have too many tasks. They feel pressured because their brain is constructing time in a way that makes everything feel urgent or impossible to catch up with. Modern neuroscience has been pointing to this for a while. Our experience of timewhat feels fast, slow, overwhelming, or not enoughis not a reading from an internal stopwatch. Its a story the brain builds using prediction, memory, emotional state, and identity. In other words: your brain doesnt observe time. Your brain generates it. Or we can say it another way. The brain predicts time, not measures it. Instead of tracking time objectively, the brain uses patterns and context to estimate how long things take. It relies on memory and sensory information to create a timeline that makes sense. But the problem is that those internal estimates shift dramatically depending on whats happening inside us. When your system is stable and regulated, your internal sense of time widens. You can think clearly, make decisions from the part of your brain built for problem-solving, and move through your day without constantly feeling behind. In contrast, when youre stressed or mentally overloaded, the brain speeds everything up. Time contracts” and you lose the feeling of agency. Minutes disappear and even simple tasks feel rushed. The external calendar hasnt changed, yet your internal clock has. Stress and emotion distort the experience of time Under stress, the brain becomes hyper-focused on prediction: What might go wrong? What am I missing? What did I forget? Whats next? This pulls attention away from continuous processing and toward threat monitoring, making time feel fragmented and chaotic. Emotion does something similar. When youre anxious, your internal timeline becomes jumpy and inconsistent. On the other hand, when youre burdened by unresolved emotional patterns or past loops, the present feels compressed and the future feels far away. This is exactly why whole months can feel like they passed in a blurand yet individual days felt strangely heavy or stretched. We experience time not as it is, but as our internal state shapes it. Identity plays a bigger role than people think Your identitywho you believe you are right now, and who you believe you should already behas a direct impact on your sense of time. When theres a big gap between your current self and the self you think you should have become by now, the brain interprets this as lateness. People living with a strained identity often feel theyre constantly running behind, even on days where their workload is reasonable. It creates a quiet pressure underneath everything they do. It is important to acknowledge that this is not laziness or lack of discipline, but a distorted time experience shaped by identity tension. Why two people with the same schedule feel time differently Every leader has seen this but cant always explain it: two employees with the same deadlines, same workload and even the same tools, yet one remains steady and the other is overwhelmed. From the outside, they look identical, yet from the inside, theyre living in completely different time worlds. One persons nervous system is regulated enough to let their brain track time coherently. The other is in chronic predictive overdrive, experiencing time as something slippery and unforgiving. Attention shapes the texture of time Theres a reason deep work feels slow and spacious, while days full of interruptions vanish in an instant. That’s because attention gives the brain enough information to build a rich, continuous timeline. Fragmentation does the opposite. When your attention is scattered, time becomes thin. It loses its structure and feels shorter. This isnt just unpleasant. But it also changes how people remember their workday, how they evaluate their progress, and how capable they feel. When companies unintentionally design days full of micro-interruptions, they are not only lowering productivitythey are altering employees subjective experience of time. And people make very different decisions when they feel like time is disappearing. What this means for modern work If time pressure and overwhelm come from internal time distortion rather than external time scarcity, then our conversations about productivity need to shift dramatically. And this doesn’t refer to better time management. It is about reducing the internal states that warp how people experience time. Leaders can influence this more than they think by using the following strategies: 1) Reduce unnecessary chronic stressors to keep time perception from becoming distorted beyond usefulness. 2) Protect uninterrupted focus windows as the foundation for coherent time experience. 3) Be intentional with urgency: Constant urgency rewires the brain to live in a compressed and reactive timeline. 4) Offer clear, grounded futures: a stable sense of where I’m going helps people feel anchored, instead of feeling constantly behind. The real work is not to fit more tasks into a fixed number of hours, but to help people live in an internal timeline that isnt distorted by stress and identity pressure. Clock time will always move at the same pace. But the time that determines burnout, clarity, performance, and decision-making is the time your brain is constructing from the inside. Understanding that difference changes everything.
Category:
E-Commerce
On Wednesday morning, local time, over one million Australian children discovered their social media accounts had vanished. And it may not be long before kids in other countries find themselves in a similar predicament. Under the new law, which was approved late last year, no one under the age of 16 in Australia will be allowed to set up accounts on platforms including Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, X, Snapchat, Twitch, and Reddit. Any accounts for people in that age category will be deactivated or removed. The law is meant to protect the mental health of children from the addictive nature of social media. Australia’s law goes three years beyond the de facto minimum age for social media limits in the U.S., where privacy legislation dictates that children under 13 are not supposed to be able to create accounts (though they easily end-run those restrictions). Anika Wells, the country’s communications minister, said those extra years will help children mature more before they take part in social media. We want children to have childhoods. We want parents to have peace of mind and we want young peopleyoung Australiansto have three more years to learn who they are before platforms assume who they are, she said earlier this year. The legislation is being watched carefully by other governments, which have struggled with the impact of social media on young minds. If Australian children show improvements in their mental (and physical) health, with reduced reports of depression, anxiety, attention deficit disorder, and more, the country’s policies could become a blueprint for other nations. Several have already put plans into motion. Denmark, Norway, Malaysia, and the European Parliament have all either announced plans to ban social media access for children, similar to the Australian law, or are in the process of creating new rules. Denmark has gone the furthest, announcing last month that it would ban access to social media for anyone under 15, noting 94% of the children in that country had profiles on at least one social media platform. Under the age of 10, half of all Danish children do. The country has not yet set a date for the ban to begin. Children and young people have their sleep disrupted, lose their peace and concentration, and experience increasing pressure from digital relationships where adults are not always present, the Danish ministry for digital affairs said. This is a development that no parent, teacher or educator can stop alone. As for the U.S., don’t expect similar legislation anytime soon. The Big Tech lobby is firmly against the policy. And tech leaders, including Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg, have a close relationship with Donald Trump. Even those whose relationship with Trump is contentious are seemingly protected. Last week, when the European Commission hit Elon Musk’s X with nearly $140 million in fines for violating its moderation law, the Trump Administration came out swinging. “The European Commission’s $140 million fine isn’t just an attack on X, it’s an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on social media. “The days of censoring Americans online are over.” Some U.S. states, including Texas and Florida, have tried to enact bans, but those measures have either failed to pass the state legislatures or have been struck down by courts. Australia’s social media ban, meanwhile, passed with overwhelming support, though some critics warned it would be too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively. Social media companies were given a year to beef up their technology to confirm user ages and teens were encouraged to begin weening themselves off of the apps, so the formal ban wouldn’t come as a shock. Teens were even given a checklist to prepare for the shift.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||