 |
|
|
|||||
As AI-generated content becomes ubiquitous, products that reveal the time, care, and judgment behind their creation will offer a powerful point of emotional and commercial differentiation. With todays AI tools, its possible to generate a complete brand experience in just a few hoursa name, a logo, a campaign, even a polished website. These systems visualize concepts with startling speed, compressing what once took weeks into an afternoon. And while most outputs remain virtual, were already glimpsing a future where AI begins shaping not just ideas, but production. As the barriers to creation continue to fall, and design becomes both instant and infinite, a new kind of value is emerging: the kind that takes time. At Whipsaw, weve embraced AI for what it enablesfaster workflows, more iterations, and rapid ideation. However, as the process becomes more efficient, we find that clients and consumers are increasingly drawn to something more challenging to replicate: the human element. Evidence of judgment. Taste. Craft. Intention. In a world of instant outputs, human hours are the new luxury. When anyone can make anything Part of AIs early allure came from its black-box noveltythe delight of watching something surprisingly good appear out of nowhere. But novelty wears thin. What once felt magical now feels pervasive. Consumers are learning to recognize when content lacks context, authorship, or accountability. As AI-generated content becomes more common, people are beginning to look for signs of authorship and intent. Tools like Adobes Content Authenticity Initiative reflect a growing demand for transparency in the creative process. At Whipsaw, we hear a version of this question every week: When AI can generate high-fidelity mockups in minutes, how do you prove the value of design that takes time? And increasingly, the answer is clear. You show your work. History, handwork, and value Throughout history, cultures have prized what visibly took time to make. A hand-thrown ceramic bowl. An embroidered sash. A gold-leafed manuscript. The visible labor wasnt just aestheticit was a testament to mastery and care. In the late 19th century, the Arts and Crafts movement emerged as a response to the soulless standardization of industrial manufacturing. In Japan, the philosophy of monozukuricontinuous, respectful craftsmanshipremains a foundational design ethic. These werent just artistic ideals. They were economic signals. They showed that something, or someone, mattered in the making. Today, were seeing a modern revival of that ethos. Proof of process, proof of value Revealing the process behind a product isnt just an old ethos. Its a contemporary design strategyand a powerful form of differentiation. Mercedes-AMGs One Man, One Engine program allows performance vehicle buyers to trace their engine to a single technician, whose name is engraved on a metal plate under the hood. Its not just a car. Its someones work. And the value of that signature is reflected in the price. Across industries, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: Products that demonstrate their creation processand the humans involved in itare commanding greater emotional and financial value. Authorship, on display Showing your work means embedding human decision making directly into the product experiencemaking authorship a feature, not a footnote. In physical products, this might manifest as exposed welds or tool marks that reveal the manufacturing process, or QR codes that direct users to a companys build videos or sourcing maps. Luxury brands have long recognized the value of visible labor: Each Herms Birkin bag is handcrafted by a single artisan, whose discreet signature marks authorship. That human connection helps justify a price point far above mass-produced alternativesbecause the object tells a story of time, mastery, and care. Digital products can do the same. Consider apps that annotate decisions, such as Headspace, which surfaces the humans behind its meditation protocols, or Are.na, which credits individual contributors to collaborative boards. Even subtle UI elements, like curated by tags or changelogs authored by designers, remind users that a personnot an algorithmshaped their experience. Brands can also spotlight their storytelling processes through behind-the-scenes content, documented iterations, or showing rejected directions that reveal how choices were made. The goal isnt to overwhelm, but to create touchpoints where human judgment is visibleand meaningful. The next innovation is intent As AI makes it easier to generate, replicate, and scale design, the rarest resource left is evidence of intent. Brands will increasingly compete not just on form or function, but on visible human investmentthe time, care, and discernment embedded in the work. Before AI, much of that effort lived behind the curtain. The magic was in the revealwhat was shown, not how it was made. But now that anyone can shortcut to a polished result, the real value lies in everything that cant be automated. Process. Judgment. Intent. For consumers in a world of automation, that kind of clarity signals trust. It says: This wasnt just made. It was considered. The brands and products that make human involvement visible wont just stand out in an AI-saturated markettheyll forge deeper, more lasting connections with users who crave authenticity. Thats not just good strategy. Its good design. Dan Harden is founder and CEO of Whipsaw
Category:
E-Commerce
Every living organism, from the simplest microbe to the tallest tree, contains a library of genetic information refined by billions of years of evolution. This biological data dwarfs even our most advanced digital systems. Nature has been running the ultimate machine learning experiment since life began, optimizing solutions for survival, efficiency, and adaptation at a scale we’re only beginning to comprehend. What if, instead of replacing nature with machines, we could work with biological systems as collaborators? That’s the promise of modern biotechnology. Nearly two decades ago, my lab-mate Alvin and I set out on what many considered an impossible quest. We were PhD students at UC Berkeley with a radical idea: What if we could apply emerging biological tools to awaken dormant capabilities in living systems that could work alongside farmers? The fertilizer problem While 78% of the air we breathe is nitrogen, plants can’t access it directly. For millions of years, soil microbes solved this problem through nitrogen fixation, converting atmospheric nitrogen into plant food. But with the widespread use of synthetic fertilizers, many of these microbes went quiet. Their nitrogen-fixing abilities switched off. For years, farmers have been scattering fertilizer across their fields and hoping enough would reach their crops. Much of it didn’t. It washed into rivers and streams, creating dead zones in our waterways. Alvin and I imagined a different approach: a living system that could work in partnership with farmers. Microbes that would live at crop roots and respond dynamically to each plant’s needs. They would be tireless collaborators, optimizing nutrient delivery with a precision that comes from billions of years of co-evolution with plants. We collected soil samples from farms across the country, isolated promising microbes, and began gently reawakening their dormant nitrogen-fixing abilities and enhancing what nature had already perfected. One day in the lab as we peered into a test tube that contained a germinating corn seed. Our partner microbes had colonized the roots of the tiny plant, actively fixing nitrogen and sharing it with their host. That little plant, growing vigorously without any added fertilizer, was proof that we had succeeded. We hadn’t created artificial life. We had awakened life’s existing potential to work in harmony with human needs. Microbial revolution Today, these microbial partners work in the soil across millions of acres of farmland worldwide, helping farmers grow more food with less environmental impact. They’ve prevented over 1.3 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions since 2022 alone. They’re part of a quiet revolution happening at the intersection of biology and human ingenuity. This revolution extends far beyond agriculture. Scientists have discovered and enhanced microbes that naturally break down oil spills in marine environments, partnering with these organisms to accelerate ocean healing. Others have found bacteria that can digest plastic waste, turning pollution into harmless byproductsnot through harsh chemicals, but through the same processes that nature uses to recycle organic matter. Researchers are developing living materials that can sense damage and repair themselves, inspired by how our own bodies heal. In medicine, we’re seeing remarkable advances: bacteria that can detect cancer cells earlier than any machine, algae that produce life-saving drugs more efficiently than factories, and personalized therapies that work with our immune systems rather than against them. Each breakthrough represents a partnership between human creativity and nature’s tested solutions. A reimagined relationship with the living world Just as AI amplifies human intelligence by learning from the data we’ve created, this new biological age amplifies human capability by collaborating with the wisdom encoded in life itself. But unlike AI, which we build from scratch, we’re working with systems that have already solved many of our greatest challenges. We just need to learn their language. This is more than a technological shift; it’s a fundamental reimagining of our relationship with the living world. For the first time in history, we can have a true dialogue with naturenot to dominate or control, but to collaborate and co-create. The choice isn’t between nature and technology. It’s about recognizing that nature is the most sophisticated technology we’ve ever encountered. And we’re just beginning to learn how to work with it. In the biological realm, those partners have been here all along, waiting for us to learn their language. The future isn’t about making biology more machine-like. It’s about discovering that biology has always been more ingenious than any machine we could build. The real revolution isn’t in controlling life, but in joining it. Karsten Temme is chief innovation officer of Pivot Bio.
Category:
E-Commerce
So, weve all been there. Youre two paragraphs into a blog post. The headline was catchy enough, the intro kind of made sense, and now your eyes are glazing over. You read over a word, a blurb, a sentence that sounds vaguely all-too-familiar and now youre wondering, Wait…did a human even write this? Odds are, youre not imagining it. AI-generated content is everywhere. It is impossible to escape. While it’s efficient, especially for meeting summaries and article recaps, you and I know the best content is the content that feels particularly human. When you spend your days working with AI (and creating comprehensive AI training for your team), you quickly start seeing how its beginning to give itself away. Here’s how to spot AI writing before you waste another five minutes of your life reading machine-generated clickbait. 1. It reads like someone trying to win an argument at a networking event. If every paragraph feels like its trying to make a strong point without actually saying anything meaningful, youre probably in AI territory. Look out for generic phrases like in todays fast-paced world or leveraging innovative strategies. Ive read these phrases so often that it occasionally feels right to use them as filler, like an SAT tutor that teaches your kid three big, impressive terms to use to crush the written portion of the test. Ultimately, this is the biggest red flag that youre reading AI-generated content. 2. Theres 0% personality and 100% too much structure. AI content often follows a painfully clean format: intro, subheads, conclusion. The content might include some big words, but its not fooling anyone. It reads like it went to school and graduated with honors, but never worked a day in the real world. Great for a college essay, not so realistic (nor creative) beyond that. Theres no strong voice, no edgejust perfectly average takes. On this note, Im seriously considering creating a support group for copywriters and marketers who embraced the em dash long before AI came around. While its become popularized as an AI tell of a blog post or article, too often its a case of mistaken identity. Tread carefully. 3. Its bland, not very controversial. This flag can be a difficult one to spot in the moment, as its important to consider varying perspectives and points of view. AI doesnt like to ruffle feathers, so youll often find it hedging every single opinion. Itll say one thing, then immediately say the opposite to keep the peace. Look out for something along the lines of, While X has benefits, its important to consider the potential downsides of Y. Lets keep writing about things that may be controversial, with strong opinions and hot takes. When creatives are writing about a particular topic, and aiming to prove a point, it doesnt seem appropriate for them to include the counterargument. Right? Youre reading to gain insight and perspective about whatever topic is at hand, not ride the see-saw. 4. The conclusion is weirdly robotic pep talk. If the article wraps with something like, As we move into the future, embracing innovation will be key, congrats, youve hit AI bingo. These vague, motivational endings are a dead giveaway. The conclusion usually feels abrupt, as if AI knows its necessary for sentence structure but is not willing to spend the time on making it truly meaningful. I rarely see a real person sign off their blogs, newsletters, or other content with such blatant corporate optimism. 5. Your brain feels…untouched. Maybe the biggest tell is how it makes you feel (or not feel). Great writing sticks with you. Even a short blog post can inspire, surprise, or challenge you. But AI-written content, on the other hand, is like a lukewarm shower. Technically fine. Emotionally forgettable. I wouldnt go so far as to claim that specific words, key, crucial, robust, or comprehensive are always AI indicators, but it is true that most writing tools cant resist overusing their favorite buzzwords. Even ChatGPT refers to these words as its greatest hits list, so its no wonder that my mind is exhausted from seeing them in others writing. I use AI daily to optimize my workstreams, beat creative blocks, and sharpen my emails. And if I dont pay attention and refine my prompts, my results will be rampant with these tells. Dont believe me? Test it out using ChatGPT. With a little practice, youll soon be able to spot an AI-generated story from a mile away. Im not an AI-hater by any measure, but its been exhausting to find that every third article I read is missing that imperfect-but-human spark. If it feels too clean, too cautious, or like it was written in under 30 seconds, it probably was. Lisa Larson-Kelley is founder and CEO of Quantious.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||