 |
|
|
|||||
In planning meetings, in brainstorms, in the messy moments when decisions need to be made before all the information is in, AI is my copilot. But not in the cute robot helper way. I treat it like my sharpest strategist, fastest researcher, and most unflinching truth-teller. As the CEO of Quantious, a future-forward marketing agency that works with tech companies, my job is to stay fast, smart, and endlessly curious; not just for myself, but for my clients. Having executive-level AI by my side is how I operate at scale without sacrificing strategy or soul. Forget about the hype of AI. Lets talk about what it really takes to work smarter, experiment faster, and free up time to be a creative leadersomething that you cannot automate. 1. AI is my executive sparring partner When youre running a fast-growing company, youre constantly making judgement calls without all of the details. Most people want ChatGPT to flatter them. I want it to challenge me. I run new product ideas, positioning statements, and brand hypotheses through AI to surface the cracks I didnt see. I use it to model outcomes, debate assumptions, and yes, poke holes in the perfect plan I thought I had. Your team might be too polite to challenge you. AI wont be, if you train it well. Start every session with a persona, such as: You are my chief strategy officer. Your job is to challenge mediocrity and raise red flags. Train it over time by giving feedback: Thats too agreeable. Give me a sharper POV or This sounds like fluff. Get specific. And really push it to dig deeper instead of giving you a standard response: This idea solves the problem, but I dont think its the best solution. Push me toward something bolder or more efficient. How would someone with 10x my time/resources/experience approach it differently? You may be surprised where this back-and-forth can take you. 2. I use AI to protect my most valuable asset: Strategic attention The less time I spend on routine admin tasks, the more time I have to steer the ship. AI is my secret weapon for clearing out the clutter. I use Bluedot to record and transcribe meetingssaving me and my team hours in cleaning up and consolidating notes, and turning around recaps and next steps in minutes. And if I need a detail from the discussion, I can even query the transcript to get the info I need, and all the context around it. To start using AI for attention management, begin with one task you do often (summarizing docs, doing premeeting research, writing recap emails) and let AI take a pass. If you want to think strategically, you need space to think. AI gives it to you. 3. I never miss a market beat I don’t have time to read every analyst report or listen to every podcast (who does?!) but I need those insights. AI curates the signal from the noise. Perplexity Deep Research turns complex trend reports into briefs to share with my team, or even my clients. Waldo gives me market snapshots faster than a team of analysts. Ive also dabbled in AI-powered podcasts, which summarize the most important industry news so I can catch up while on the go. They supplement my other favorite podcasts, so Im always armed with the latest trends and biggest industry moves. 4. I baked AI into the org chart At Quantious, AI isnt a department. Its a utility, like Wi-Fi or electricity. Every team has access to tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Slack AI. Designers use it to explore creative variations. Ops uses it to document processes faster. Marketers draft content 10 times faster. The tech isnt the point. The enablement is. While not every team member taps into these tools on a daily basis, having them in the toolkit keeps the door wide open for experimentation. Ive said it before: AI has made remote work more productive, seamless, and well-documented. We dont just integrate AI into workflows; we integrate it into our collective intelligence. Because the point isnt to do more faster, it is meant to elevate how we operate, across the board. Remember, AI isnt the intern. Its your most strategic hire. The truth is: Your team doesnt need you to be a prompt engineer. They need you to be an AI-literate leader. AI is no longer a tool in your workflow. Its a seat at your table. Treat it like a trusted advisor, and youll make sharper decisions, faster, without sacrificing strategy or soul. Lisa Larson-Kelley is founder and CEO of Quantious.
Category:
E-Commerce
Nvidia forecast fourth-quarter revenue above Wall Street estimates on Wednesday, betting on booming demand for its AI chips from cloud providers against the backdrop of widespread concerns of an artificial intelligence bubble. The results from the AI chip leader mark a defining moment for Wall Street, as global markets looked to the chip designer to determine if investing billions of dollars in AI infrastructure expansion had resulted in towering valuations that potentially outpaced fundamentals. The world’s most valuable company expects fiscal fourth-quarter sales of $65 billion, plus or minus 2%, compared with analysts’ average estimate of $61.66 billion, according to data compiled by the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG). Shares of the AI market bellwether rose over 4% in extended trading. Ahead of the results, doubts had pushed Nvidia shares down nearly 8% in November, after a 1,200% surge in the past three years. The broader market has declined almost 3% this month. Still, analysts and investors widely expected the underlying demand for AI chips, which has powered Nvidia’s results since ChatGPT’s launch in late 2022, to remain strong. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said last month that the company has $500 billion in bookings for its advanced chips through 2026. Big Tech, among Nvidia’s largest customers, has doubled down on spending to expand AI data centers and snatch the most advanced, pricey chips as it commits to multibillion, multi-gigawatt build-outs. Microsoft reported a record capital expenditure of nearly $35 billion for its fiscal first quarter last month, with roughly half of it spent primarily on chips. Nvidia expects an adjusted gross margin of 75%, plus or minus 50 basis points, in the fourth quarter, compared with the market expectation of 74.5%. By Arsheeya Bajwa and Stephen Nellis, Reuters
Category:
E-Commerce
Since beginning his second term in office, President Trump has taken a sledgehammer to climate action. His administration has made plans to expand offshore oil and gas drilling, canceled billions of dollars in clean energy projects, rolled back tax credits for electric vehicles, pulled the United States out of the Paris climate agreement, released a report that downplays the risks of climate change, and on and on. Climate experts have been vocal about the fact that Trump is setting back climate action, which puts the entire world at risk. The U.S. is the second-most polluting country in the world, behind only China. China, however, has been investing heavily in renewable power, and its total greenhouse gas emissions have been dropping as a result. Now, a new analysis by ProPublica and the Guardian attempts to quantify what that setback could actually look like. What the analysis found Trumps anti-climate policies could release so many extra greenhouse gases over the next decade that they could lead to as many as 1.3 million more temperature-related deaths globally, in the 80 years after 2035, the analysis found. That estimate covers heat-related deaths, minus the fewer deaths that will occur from cold temperatures. Already, heat is the leading cause of all weather-related deaths, and climate change has led to a noticeable uptick in heat related deaths. In the U.S. alone, heat-related deaths have increased by more than 50% since 2000, according to the Yale School of Public Health. The 1.3 million excess deaths does not include, the outlets note, the massive number of deaths from climate changes broader impacts, like droughts, floods, diseases, hurricanes, wildfires, and even lower crop yields. The number is, admittedly, a small figure when compared to the total number of deaths caused by temperatures changing because of climate change. A 2021 study on the mortality costs of carbon projected that, between 2020 and 2100, the planet will see 83 million temperature-related excess deaths under a business as usual emissions scenario. The ProPublica/Guardian analysis acknowledges this, but adds that the figure attributed to Trumps policies speaks to the human cost of prioritizing U.S. corporate interests over the lives of people around the globe. How the research was conducted To conduct the analysis, the outlets used scientific models to estimate how many additional emissions will be released into the atmosphere because of Trumps policies. They also took into account the mortality cost of carbon metric, which predicts temperature-related deaths from emissions. In responses to questions from ProPublica and the Guardian, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contested the science underpinning their analysis, dismissing it as moral posturing. It added that the core calculation method ignores the dramatic uncertainties that dominate long-term climate projections. But climate scientists say the metric is valid, they report. Prior to Trump, we had the most ambitious climate policy that the U.S. has ever come up withour best effort to date by far of addressing this growing problem, Marshall Burke, an economist at the Doerr School of Sustainability at Stanford University, told the Guardian. When we roll these things back, he added, it is fundamentally affecting the damages were going to see around the world.”
Category:
E-Commerce
The gap between the richest and poorest Americans is widening in what Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has called a “bifurcated economy,” as the cost of living skyrockets from housing to food prices, but wages for most workers remain stagnant. Basically, high-income individuals are doing well, while lower-income consumers are struggling more and more. That situation has sparked discussions about whether we’re in a so-called “K-shaped economy.” A K-shaped economycoined after the shape of the letter: a horizontal line marked by two lines, with one going down and the other uphappens when the economy is rolling along, and then it suddenly loses steam and begins to drop. And then, after a period, the Fed comes in and lowers interest rates to get things going again, professor Peter Ricchiuti of Tulane University’s A.B. Freeman School of Business tells Fast Company. Simply put, in a K-shaped economy, the Federal Reserve sees the economy weakening, possibly leading to a recession, so it lowers interest rates to stimulate the economy in order to try and avoid that. “This action really benefits the upper class, as it makes the value of their investmentsstocks, bonds, and real estaterise,” Ricchiuti explains. “More often than not, the wealthy are better off than when the downturn began.” “Meanwhile, the middle class is hurt even more,” he continues. “If they have any savings at all, its invested in money market funds and bank CDs. These now offer lower returns because interest rates on those instruments have been lowered.” But “it’s not the Feds fault,” Ricchiuti adds. “The most powerful tool in [the Federal Reserve’s] toolbox is lowering interest rates. Theyre trying to boost the economy but, in doing so, they are widening the economic gap.” So, are we headed toward a recession? “I do think the economy is slowing down and potentially moving into recessionary conditions that may show up next year,” Melina Murren Vosse, assistant professor of finance at the University of San Diego’s Knauss School of Business, tells Fast Company. “Talk of the AI bubble, general overvaluations, and global trade uncertainty seem to be making markets squeamish lately.” Ricchiuti says it’s “tricky” to tell whether we’re heading to a recession “because unemployment numbers are the key indicator of a recession, and we haven’t gotten unemployment levels for quite some time.” “There just isn’t enough information to feel really comfortable making a determination,” he adds. That’s in part because the Trump administration fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), which collects, crunches, and publishes those unemployment numbers. On August 1, President Donald Trump ordered the firing of Erika McEntarfer after the agency released a report that showed hiring had slowed down significantly over the past three months. Then, a government shutdown further delayed the collection and release of the numbers. The BLS last released unemployment numbers for the month of August. We are still waiting on September and October numbers, and the BLS said it will not release a full U.S. jobs report for October until it has a full report for November, which it also pushed back to December 16. Generally speaking, a recession is when there are two consecutive quarters of negative gross domestic product (GDP) growth. But it’s impossible to determine if that’s happened because the numbers haven’t come out. However, Ricchiuti notes that even though people fear a recession, it generally lasts only a year, while an economic expansion lasts seven years, he says. So even if you’re fearing a recession, it may be more temporary than it might seem.
Category:
E-Commerce
The Labor Department said Wednesday that it will not be releasing a full jobs report for October because the 43-day federal government shutdown meant it couldn’t calculate the unemployment rate and some other key numbers. Instead, it will release some of the October jobs data most importantly the number of jobs that employers created last month along with the full November jobs report, now due a couple of weeks late on Dec. 16. The department’s “employment situation” report usually comes out the first Friday of the month. But the government shutdown disrupted data collection and delayed the release of the reports. For example, the September jobs report, now coming out Thursday, was originally due Oct. 3. The monthly jobs report consists of two parts: a survey of households that is used to determine the unemployment rate, among other things; and the “establishment” survey of companies, nonprofits and government agencies that is used to track job creation, wages and other measurements of labor market health. The Labor Department said Wednesday that the household survey for October could not be conducted because of the shutdown and could not be done retroactively. But it was able to collect the hiring numbers from employers, and those will come out with the full November report. Wednesday’s announcement means the September jobs numbers will likely get extra scrutiny Thursday. They are the last full measurement of hiring and unemployment that Federal Reserve policymakers will see before they meet Dec. 9-10 and decide whether to cut their benchmark interest rate for the third time this year. The jobs numbers have lately been contentious. After the July jobs report proved disappointing, President Donald Trump abruptly fired the official responsible for collecting the data, Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer. McEntarfer herself was quick to say there was nothing suspicious about Wednesday’s announcement. No conspiracy here, folks, she posted on the social media site Bluesky. “BLS was entirely shutdown for six weeks. Payroll data from firms can be retroactively collected for October. The household survey cannot be conducted retrospectively. This is just a straightforward consequence of having all field staff furloughed for over a month.” ____ This story has been corrected to show that the September jobs report is coming out Thursday, not Friday. Paul Wiseman, AP economics writer AP Economics Writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this report.
Category:
E-Commerce
Sites : [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] next »