Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

20.12Tesla is recalling almost 700,000 vehicles over a tire pressure monitor issue
20.12James Bond (the movie franchise, not the spy) may be in deep jeopardy
20.12Google's Gemini Deep Research tool is now available globally
20.12How to schedule messages on Instagram
20.12Audi Vietnam reads brainwaves to help consumers decide whether the Q8 is the car for them
20.12Intel Arc B580 review: The new king of $250 GPUs (for now)
20.12Hisense's HT Saturn speakers feature wireless Dolby Atmos and room calibration
20.12Ubisoft quietly squeezes out another NFT game featuring Rayman, Blood Dragon
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

21.12Terry Savage: Giving the gift of a college savings plan
21.12Learn with ETMarkets: Understanding base metals and how to trade it
21.12Google suggests fixes to its search monopoly
21.12LNG producer Venture Global files for IPO on NYSE
21.1222 smallcap stocks stood out with double-digit gains in a forgetful week for Indian investors
21.12FPI Focus: Financials, IT, and real estate dominate December inflows
21.12Siemens sounds alarm: Capital goods stocks plunge amid capex concerns
21.12Terry Savage: Gifts to spark financial interest in the young
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .