 |
|
|
|||||
Most adults are in the very early stages of grasping how to use artificial intelligence. The The Lego Group thinks that children need to build their own learning path to understand the fast-evolving technology. On Monday, the Danish toy maker debuted a new computer science and AI curriculum for K8 classrooms, Legos first foray into AI that comes more than three years after the debut of OpenAIs ChatGPT chatbot. The Lego Education Computer Science & AI kits include Lego bricks and other interactive hardware components, as well as online education materials intended to take children from the beginning stages of AI literacy through hands-on experimentation. Debuting in classrooms this April, Lego says each package will cost $339.95 and is designed for groups of four students. Kids want in on the AI conversation Lego says 90% of kids want to learn more about how to use AI, but two-thirds feel left out of the AI conversation, according to a survey of 800 students ages 8 to 14 across the U.S., Germany, South Korea, and Australia conducted in late 2025. Children have their own thoughts on how AI should be used, or how it shouldnt be used, says Andrew Sliwinski, head of product experience of LEGO Education. Lets bring children into the conversation in an informed and empowered way. The curriculum will be sold in three grade bandsK2, 35, and 68and was designed as an end-to-end program for teaching both computer science fundamentals and AI concepts. According to Sliwinski, no data children share ever leaves the computer. The system works offline, and no private information is sent to Lego or any third party. Escaping the AI panic cycle Sliwinski says Lego wanted to move past the two dominant narratives around AI and children. One frames AI as an unstoppable force that will render kids obsolete before adulthood. The other calls for strict bans that prevent children from interacting with the technology at all. What both of those narratives are often missing is that children are capable, he says. They have their own opinions and thoughts on AI and how it should and shouldnt be used. Why toy makers are struggling with AI The broader toy industry is still fumbling its approach to artificial intelligence. Mattel failed to deliver an AI-powered toy in 2025 under its partnership with OpenAI. Another AI-enabled teddy bear was banned after it engaged in sexually explicit conversations with minors. In California, a state senator has introduced a bill that would enact a four-year ban on AI chatbot toys for children under 18. Why banning AI wont work I would never suggest buying a toy that has AI embedded in it, says Rebecca Winthrop, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. It is just way too soon. Still, Winthrop argues that banning AI in schools is unrealistic. Students will find workarounds, and many already encounter AI passively through everyday apps. If AI can write a seventh-grade paper on World War II, students lose the critical thinking that comes from doing the work themselves, Winthrop says. That means educators will need to redesign assignments so the processnot just the outputmatters. Teachers are really going to have to shift the assignments they give, she says. Teaching under uncertainty Justin Reich, an associate professor at MIT, says schools will need to operate under uncertainty for years. No one knows exactly what a 5-year-old should understand about AIbut waiting for perfect answers isnt an option. Were almost certainly making mistakes, Reich says, likening the moment to early internet literacy efforts that later proved flawed. Sliwinski says the payoff becomes clear in the classroom. During a recent visit to a fourth-grade class in Chicago, students trained Lego-based robots to dance using a machine-learning model. When commands were off, the robots lost their rhythm. That creates a shift in power dynamics, Sliwinski says. AI is no longer the smartest thing in the roomthe kids are.
Category:
E-Commerce
Yes, there are the New Years traditions of setting ambitious goals and ditching bad habits, but one evergreen resolution that ought to top lists is to banish bad design. Why endure something that simply doesnt work (or is an affront to aesthetics) any longer than we have to? In the spirit of fresh starts, we polled experts in architecture, tech, industrial design, and urbanism on the everyday annoyances and the big-picture issues that they think are in desperate need of a refresh in 2026. (Top on my personal list? Eye-searing headlights.) Design is inherently an optimistic act, and by fixing these issues, were a step closer to a more beautiful and better world. [Photo: Snehit/Adobe Stock] Data Centers Data centers are the significant buildings of the moment, and we have a responsibility to make them part of our cities as theyre really powering the future. The buildings have to perform at the highest technical level, but they also need to connect and respond to a sense of place and to the community around it. For example, we designed a data center with a facade that has an intricate pattern language that feels more like a theater or civic building and other centers with mass timber, which lends warmth and beauty to the structure while also bringing a sustainability story to the structure. Every data center project of ours now starts with thinking through resilient strategies, including reducing or eliminating evaporative cooling and integrating next-generation thinking on energy usage. At the same time, there are people still working in these buildings and there needs to be consideration for the workplace as well. It’s about technology plus people, and we can’t ignore the human side of this because recruitment and retention are still key considerations. Its also interesting to think about what to do in a really dense urban environment. Were involved in conversion projects that take aging, underutilized office buildings and explore vertical mixed use. It’s not just about converting office to residential, which were doing in many locations. Can you take an aging office building and part of its reuse becomes a data center? In 2026, well see more of a global dialogue from a real estate standpoint on urban opportunities that includes thinking about data centers vertically. Jordan Goldstein, Co-CEO of Gensler [Source Image: whitecityrecords/Adobe Stock] Crossover and Compact SUVs Living in Los Angeles, Im surrounded by automobiles all day. Im always disappointed by how homogenous so many archetypes are. Crossover and compact SUVs are all so similar that you could swap the badges on any of them, and no one would know the difference between the brands. Unfortunately, over the last decade the same can be said of most sports cars. All the major brands have adopted the wide rear body of the [Porsche] 911, and for no reason; their engines are in the front of the car and dont demand the stability and width to balance the weight that sits on the rear wheels of the 911. Every brand has an origin story, and many of their older iconic cars were based on original ideas. As recently as the 90s, car brands held a unique design language. In the past, the only market that had homogeneous design was the Soviet Union. Our culture is based on differentiation in the market, where customers have choices. Today we lack real choice. This all points to a lack of vision and conservative leadership at the major automakers. There is no risk-taking, and the customer is given a design thats the result of market research rather than innovation and design. This should be a priority because it instills poor valueslack of originality, fear-driven business strategy, zero risk-takingon the built environment and our culture. Jonathan Olivares, Creative Director of Knoll [Illustration: FC] Data Ownership Every time we swipe our MetroCard, visit a doctor, buy groceries, or scroll through our phones, we are creating data. But we almost never get to see it to understand ourselves better. The data flows in one direction only, from us into systems that are used to optimize operations and algorithms and train models. What if instead our data could come back to us in a form that can help us see the patterns in our lives and understand our own stories? I want to redesign this fundamental relationship.The issue is that data has become the language that we need to navigate life but we haven’t been taught to speak it; and the interfaces that could help us learn are designed for administrators and quarterly reports only, rarely for actual people trying to understand their own lives. Imagine getting home from a doctor’s appointment and receiving a beautiful understandable visualization of your healthover time, where you can see patterns you didnt know existed. This is the type of context that can help us ask better questions about our health. Or imagine your transit system revealing the mundane rhythms of your own life back to you (the coffee shop you always stop at on Tuesdays, the routes you take when you’re stressed versus calm). This would close the literacy gap by making data comprehensible in the moments when it matters most without dumbing down complexity and nuances. I’ve spent my career proving we can do this. Better design here means more agency. It means people who can advocate for themselves. It means closing the gap between those who can speak data and those who can’t. Giorgia Lupi, Partner at Pentagram [Illustration: FC] AI Interfaces Im excited to see how teams rethink and redesign user interfaces for an AI-native world. Today, were still in the MS-DOS era of AI where every prompt, every agent, and every emerging modality is, for the most part, a long text response in a conversational interface. My prediction is that in 2026, well see a shift toward richer, more dynamic interfaces where both inputs and outputs evolve far beyond text. Its not surprising that AI user interfaces began as chatbots. Large language models operate on tokens, and text is the fastest, cheapest medium to build, debug, and evaluate. But decades of software and interface design have made something clear: humans dont think in language alone. We think spatially. We understand through motion, contrast, hierarchy, and causality, and our instinct is to act through direct manipulation, not just typed commands. As AI capabilities evolve, design is more important than ever. Visual interfaces arent going away, and neither is the need to see, shape, and refine ideas as we work. Designers have a rare chance to define the rules and patterns of this new interface era, shaping what work, play, and productivity will look like for decades to come. Loredana Crisan, Chief Design Officer of Figma [Source Photo: serdarerenlere/Adobe Stock] Material Labeling When anyone (architects, clients, contractors) walks into a big-box store, it would be transformative to see a Nutri-score or Local Law 33 energy grade for materials, but for wood in particular since its so widely used. A better system would treat wood like food, with clear, standardized material labeling. You should be able to see where the wood comes from, almost like buying eggs when youre faced with this wall of different levels of chicken torture. Material supply chains struggle with standardization and transparency for many reasons, but in my opinion, it is because consumers didn’t know they should be demanding it. For example, once it became clear that Quartz countertops were causing silicosis by those cutting the material, consumers were horrified. So much so that the Australian government made the material illegal. The problem is big-box retailers, where most wood is purchased, rarely surface this information, despite occasionally stocking high-quality or responsibly sourced material hidden in plain sight. Greater transparency at the point of purchase would empower people to make more precise decisions about a whole host of values that are important to them. When I walk into a box retailer, I want to know which 2xs are Code A (regeneratively cultivated through methods of land conservation and repair by a local within 100 miles who has been historically disenfranchised) or Code B (selectively harvested and replanted by a fifth generation land and sawmill owner using Indigenous cool burning to prevent forest fires) or Code C (small batch monocultures grown at high efficiency to prevent the replacement of biodiverse unproductive forests), etc. Lindsey Wickstrom, Architect and Founding Principal of Mattaforma [Source Photo: Emagnetic/Adobe Stock] Outdoor Lighting How about we all start taking a neighborly approach to outdoor lighting? When colleagues and friends talk to me about lighting, they used to mention wonderful festival lights they had just seen or lamps they appreciated or hated. But these days they mostly complain about light streaming into their windows from someone elses outdoor lighting. In the city, a new commercial tower in midtown streams constantly changing light into bedroom windows literally miles away. Entertaining for some, apparently, and intensely disruptive for others. Not to mention the damage to fish and bird habitat.
Category:
E-Commerce
Its become almost a cliché to talk about how consistently organizational change fails. Study after study finds that roughly three-quarters of change efforts dont achieve their objectives. There are underlying forces that work against us adapting to changeincluding synaptic, network and cost effectsthat lead to resistance. Another problem lies in how we study change itself. Typically, researchers at an academic institution or a consulting firm interview executives that were involved in successful efforts and try to glean insights to write case studies. These are famously flawed, lacking controls, and often relying on self-serving accounts. One unlikely place to look for insight is a little-known academic named Gene Sharp, who wasnt interested in business at all, but political revolutions. What he found was that there are sources of power that support the status quo and these have an institutional basis. As long as they remain in place, nothing will ever change. But if you can shift them, anything becomes possible. A Revolutionary Shift Before 1789, the world was ruled by monarchies rooted in the divine right of kings and the feudal system. Yet that year would prove to be an inflection point. The American Constitution and the French Revolution began a fundamental realignment of power that culminated in the revolutions of 1848, a widespread uprising against monarchies that spread across Europe. But in the late 19th century something new emerged: nonviolent movements. Rising out of the abolitionist efforts in the US, which then morphed into the struggle for womens suffrage, new techniques of fighting for change emerged. Among those watching closely was a young law student, Mohandas Gandhi. He would later perfect their techniques in South Africa and India. It was Gandhis work that Gene Sharp first began to study and led him to an epiphany: violent revolts would always be at a disadvantage because the regime controls the means of violence, such as the military, police and other security agencies. It also has the power to create and enforce laws. Nonviolent movements, on the other hand, could fight with very different weapons, those of psychology, sociology, and economics, where the regime can be put at a disadvantage. Thats how Gandhi was able to win against seemingly impossible odds. What Sharp wanted to do was create a systematic strategic framework so that anyone could achieve what Gandhi did. Thats what led to his key insight: power is rooted in institutions, and only by shifting them can true transformation occur. Understanding Sources Of Power Think about an all-powerful dictator somewhere, like Vladimir Putin in Russia or Xi Jinping in China. Then, imagine that all of the janitors decide not to come in to work. That all-powerful dictator is now powerless to get the trash picked up. He can arrest the janitorsor even have them killedbut picking up all the trash in the country is not something he can do himself. The point is that a leaders power extends only as far as their ability to control or influence institutions. They can only make laws to the extent that they control the legislative system and can only enforce those laws if they control or influence the legal system and the police. The same goes for commercial institutions, educational institutions, the media and so on. That, in a nutshell, is Sharps key insight: power is never monolithic but distributed across many institutions, all of which have vulnerabilities. It can be attacked wherever you find a weakness. If you can influence the institutions that the regime depends on to maintain and enforce its power, you can create genuine transformation. This is not just a theory. It has been proven to work in practice. The color revolutions were rooted in Sharps ideas as was the Arab Spring in Egypt. The Center for Applied Non-Violent Actions and Strategies (CANVAS) has put them to work in over 50 countries and even offers a comprehensive curriculum to help others bring about the change they want to see. Yet Sharp’s ideas dont apply only to political movements. As I showed in Cascades, they can be just as effective in driving organizational change. Mapping Power In Your Organizational Ecosystem One thing every leader quickly learns is how little real power they really have. Formal authority only goes so far. Much like Gene Sharp observed about regimes, the status quo has sources of power keeping it in place. Often these have had yearseven decadesto entrench themselves. They will work against any significant change effort. Consider the dilemma of the PC manufacturers in the 1980s. It was clear that Dells direct sales model was vastly superior to selling through distributors and market leaders like Compaq and HP made a number of efforts to adopt it. Yet so many stakeholders, including powerful executives within the company and external partners, had a stake in the existing model. So nothing ever changed. Think about that for a minute. Pundits like to portray firms that get disrupted as simply not paying attention. But thats often not true. In this case, the leaders of these PC firms accurately diagnosed the problem and created strategies, such as modified compensation schemes, to address it, but still failed to overcome the forces keeping the status quo in place. Thats why in our transformational change workshops, one of the first steps is mapping the sources of power well nee to influence to make change happen. Much like Sharp revealed about political revolutions, once youve identified institutional targets, you can start designing tactics to address them. Change Isnt About Persuasion, Its About Power All too often, we think about change in terms of persuasion. We think if we can just come up with the right message, broadcast it widely and get it to the right people, that change will happen. But decades of evidence shows thats not true. Even if we are able to inform people and change their attitudes, they are unlikely to change their behavior. What Gene Sharp showed us is that change isnt about persuasion, its about power. To bring about transformation, we need to undermine the sources of power that underlie the present state while strengthening the forces that favor a different future. If you can influence the institutional stakeholders keeping the status quo in place, change can happen. If you cant, it is unlikely things will ever change. That also helps explain why so many change efforts fail. They start with tactics designed to create a specific effect, such as build awareness or create a sense of urgency. Leaders roll out communication campaigns, design training programs, or host events like hackathons. Then they congratulate themselves when the action achieves the intended effect and wonder why genuine change never happened. Until you identify, analyze, and understand exactly what your actions need to be targeted at, youre just wasting your time. Every enterprise, whether its an organization or an entire society, is governed by institutions that maintain the status quo. Once you are able to internalize that simple truth, you are ready to lead change effectively. Change isnt about snappy slogans or clever campaigns. Its what happens when you build the capacity to influence institutions.
Category:
E-Commerce
The majority of us see change as a blind scary leap into the unknowna scary evolution that demands we give up on everything we know. But what if we reframed change, not as something that happens to us, but as something we actively choose? Traditionally people perceived change in black-and-white terms: either you can change, or you cant. That kind of thinking sets us up for failure by assuming that change requires some grand, perfect plan or major shift in direction. However, we also have the power to make small changes, no matter how minor they seem. And it’s these small changes that, over time, lead to profound transformation. Fear Takes the Wheel The most common reason people resist change is fear. And fear takes many forms: fear of failure, fear of the unknown, and fear of making the wrong move hold us back from making choices that could improve our lives. The fear of taking that first step is often so overwhelming that we decide to stay stuck, because inaction feels safer than risking the potential for discomfort or failure. We keep telling ourselves, Im not ready yet, or Ill probably fail. But these stories we tell ourselves only deepen our sense of powerlessness. They might make us feel comfortable by letting us off the hook, but these excuses dont help us become more capable, either. The issue is that fear doesnt just make us inactive; it keeps us stuck. As humans, we’re always making choicesconsciously or unconsciously. The hamster running on its wheel is a perfect metaphor here: it runs tirelessly, not because it doesnt have the ability to stop, but because it doesnt choose to stop. At any moment, that hamster can step off the wheel. And in many instances, so can you. The Cost of Inaction You have more control than you think. Staying stuck is a decision in itself, one that often carries a higher price than taking a leap. Consider this: Even if you stand in the middle of the road, you risk getting run over. This is the paradox of fear: Were afraid of making a “bad” choice, yet the failure to choose can often be the most costly decision we make. Research on organizational change shows how employees who resist change are more likely to experience disruption, anxiety, and negative emotions the longer they resist, which can make changing in the future even harder. Unchecked resistance can decrease productivity, lower morale, cause project delays, and increase turnover. Leaders and organizations that proactively manage resistance by building trust, clarity, and support can transform these challenges into opportunities for growth and adaptation. In contrast, those who embrace even small, incremental changes are more likely to experience increased confidence, a sense of accomplishment, and a willingness to face bigger challenges. The learning? Its the small wins that build momentum. In his 20 years as manager of the All Blacks, the New Zealand Rugby team, Darren Shand has seen how embracing even small change can catalyze teams to perform in remarkable ways. For over a decade, the All Blacks were the top ranked rugby team in the world, driven largely not just by talent but by embracing trust, positivity, and growth: During my time with the All Blacks, I learned that transformation rarely comes from radical changeit comes from consistent small choices made with purpose. At the highest level, we found that growth was less about doing more, and more about doing the little things better, every single day. The Power of Minor Shifts So, whats holding you back from better embracing change? Instead of seeing change as a monumental task, think of it as a series of small choices that add up over time. Start small: maybe it’s trying a new hobby, having a conversation with someone that you’ve been avoiding, or taking a short walk every day. These tiny decisions may seem insignificant in the moment, but theyre the building blocks of personal transformation. Each time you make a choice to step out of your comfort zone, no matter how small, youre signaling to yourself that change is possible. Ready for Change? Consider This If youre ready to embrace change, start by asking yourself a few simple but powerful questions: Whats the cost of staying where I am? Reflect on what youre risking by not making a change. Sometimes, the discomfort of the present moment is less painful than the long-term consequences of staying stuck. What ONE small step can I take today? Change doesnt have to be grandiose. Whats one tiny action you can take today that will start to shift your course? What am I afraid of? Often, fear is exaggerated in our minds. What is the worst thing that could happen if you tried something new? Could the benefits outweigh the risks? Who can support me in this change? Change doesnt have to be a solo endeavor. Who can be your accountability partner, or who can offer guidance along the way? By asking these questions, youll gain clarity on why change matters to you and how you can begin to make it happen, step by step. Change is Always a Choice Change is not as hard or as out of reach as we often make it out to be. The key is recognizing that, just like a hamster on its wheel, you have the power to stop running in circlesand step off. You have the power to make a change, however small, and with each choice, your world transforms. In the end, so much of the change we face isnt something that happens to us. Its something we choose.
Category:
E-Commerce
When a 7.7-magnitude earthquake hit Myanmar last year, roads buckled and thousands of buildings collapsed. But a group of small, ultra-low-cost homes made from bamboo survived without any damage. Finished just days before the quake, the houses are emergency shelters for some of the millions of people displaced by Myanmars ongoing civil war. Myanmar-based architecture studio Blue Temple worked with its spinoff construction company Housing Now to make the simple prefab homes as low-cost as possible while still able to withstand natural disasters. We built them for the price of a smartphoneabout $1,000 U.S. dollars per house, says architect and Blue Temple founder Raphaël Ascoli. [Photo: Raphaël Ascoli] Engineering bamboo for earthquake resilience Bamboo has a long history as a construction material in the country, but the team saw an opportunity to innovate with it. Ascoli, who has been working in Myanmar for the last decade, partnered with a local bamboo carpenter on the concept. [Photo: Raphaël Ascoli] The material is already cheaper to use than wood, concrete, or steel. But the architecture studio helped cut costs further by using a thin, low-cost species of bamboounlike the large species typically used in constructionand bundling it together to make it stiff and strong. The construction company builds beams from the bamboo and then puts them together in structural frames that we can just assemble like an Ikea kit in less than a week, says Ascoli. Because of the organic natural of the bamboo that we weave together into the frames, it gives the house a bit of flexibility. Instead of being very stiff and brittle like concrete, it can move a little bit. [Photo: Aung Htay Hlaing] Any bamboo structure has some advantages in earthquakes because of its light weight and flexibility, but the company found ways to boost that performance. We built a lot of prototypes and then pulled on them until the breaking point, Ascoli says. You can evaluate the maximum pressure that can be put on the house before failing. They made tweaks to each joint to make the buildings stronger and more weatherproof. The massive earthquake was a real-life proof of concept, says Ascoli. The homes, in a camp for displaced people, were less than 10 miles from the epicenter of the quake, but none of them needed repairs. [Photo: Aung Htay Hlaing] A DIY path to scaling shelter without NGOs The company has been building homes for displaced people since Myanmars coup in 2021. While the design can be flexible, its typically a simple room that residents can divide for living and sleeping; camps have separate shared bathrooms and kitchens. [Photo: Aung Htay Hlaing] So far, the work has happened at a relatively small scale. The team is small, and funding from NGOswhich was limited to begin withhas started to disappear. When the Trump administration shut down USAID, that had massive consequences on the humanitarian response in Myanmar, says Ascoli. A lot of NGOs are now closing down and unable to continue operating. Other countries have also cut funding. Theres also a shortage of construction labor because of the war. [Photo: Raphaël Ascoli] To keep going, the team is experimenting with new approaches. If we want to scale, we have to be radical, he says. The latest project, developed over the last 18 months, is a DIY construction manual that helps citizens incorporate some of the design teams techniques to optimize bamboo construction as they build homes themselves. The humanitarian sector is kind of failing at the moment because its relying on unreliable sources of funding, and its an archaic system, says Ascoli. Were basically trying to test out if there is an alternative to traditional humanitarian response, and trying to find what can be the post-NGO humanitarian response programs that will replace the old systems.
Category:
E-Commerce
Sites : [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] next »