 |
|
|
|||||
Snapple might be gearing up for a long-awaited comeback by taking a page out of its 90s playbook. On February 18, Snapples parent company, Keurig Dr Pepper, announced that the beloved tea brand is unveiling a refreshed visual identity designed to return the Snapple brand to icon-status. The new look, which will roll out beginning this March, includes new graphics, a logo inspired by the brands 90s look, and an updated bottle design that hearkens back to its original glass packaging. At the same time, Keurig Dr Pepper told Fast Company that its reinvesting in marketing efforts for Snapple, including through an ongoing campaign focused on the drink’s hometown of New York City. For Snapple, the new look and marketing boost represent a return to form thats been a long time coming. After Snapples heyday in the 90scharacterized by its scrappy roots, funky packaging, and wacky ad strategythe brand has struggled to hold onto cultural relevance amidst a catastrophic sale, ownership changes, and several ill-advised rebrands. Now, its looking to tap back into the playful energy that once made it the beverage of choice for 90s kids. Current packaging (left) and 2026 refresh (right) [Image: Keurig Dr Pepper] Snapple’s rollercoaster of a brand history Snapple was founded in 1972 in Long Island, New York, by three friends. Their initial idea was for a company called Unadulterated Food Products, which would capitalize on a new wave of interest in better-for-you foods by selling fruit juices to health stores. One founder, Leaonrd Marsh, would later say of the venture that he knew as much about juice as about making an atom bomb. As The New York Times noted in Marshs 2013 obituary, the three men did wind up making a bomb of sorts: a batch of carbonated apple juice that accidentally fermented, shooting scores of bottle caps skyward. Thankfully, this happy accident sparked a transition from the name Unadulterated Food Products to Snapple, a portmanteau of snappy and apple. Snapples bottles were made from a rounded glass, featured bright colors and a slightly cursive logo, and emitted a satisfying snap sound when the cap released the beverages carbonation. Snapples original business model involved partnering with independent distributors to stock the beverage in smaller stores. The brand truly took off in the early 90s, when it began to enter the cultural zeitgeist through a series of zany, irreverent ads that emphasized its underdog status compared to big names like Coca Cola and Pepsi. Undoubtedly, though, its biggest asset was a spokesperson named Wendy Kaufman, who, after appearing in several ads, became a beloved representative known as Wendy the Snapple lady (see this spot and this spot of Kaufman answering fan questions). Between 1992 and 1994, sales jumped from $232 million to $774 million. Then, in 1994, Quaker Oats acquired Snapple in a $1.7 billion transaction that would go down in marketing textbooks as a prime example of how not to make a deal. Quaker swooped in, sanded down Snapples edgy personality, made its bottles bigger, relegated Kaufman to the back burner, and scrapped its independent distribution model, only to sell the company just three years later to Triarc Companies for $300 million. A brand disaster, indeed. A post-“Quakergate” challenge Since Quakergate, Snapple has been fighting an uphill battle to maintain cultural relevancea journey thats involved multiple rebrands and several ownership changes. Along the way, it has shed many of the brand assets that originally made it an outlier on grocery store shelves. In 2008, Snapple became part of the Dr Pepper Snapple Group when Cadbury spun off its beverage business. Then, in 2018, Snapple joined Keurig Dr Pepper through a merger of Dr Pepper Snapple Group and Keurig Green Mountain. Between 2016 and 2017, Dr Pepper Snapple reported a 3% decline in the sale of Snapple products. According to Derek Dabrowski, SVP of brand marketing at Keurig Dr Pepper, Snapple has seen overall retail sales growth since the 2018 merger, but more recently that momentum slowed as shelf presence declined and marketing support eased. Undoubtedly, a not insignificant part of the brands struggles has emerged from the fact that Snapple has lost its quirk. The brand got refreshes in both 2008 and 2015, and in 2021 Keurig Dr Pepper gave it a full-on rebrand. Snapples new logo was ultra-modernized into a blue-and-white sans serif; its glass bottles were replaced with recycled plastic; and its charmingly kitschy graphics were swapped for more commercial imagery. The company also attempted to reach younger consumers with a new line called Snapple Elements, which ultimately fizzled out. Longtime fans of the brand bemoaned the changes,with many claiming that Snapple tasted better out of glass. Gone was the quintessential Snapple snap, replaced with a quotidian plastic sigh. Snapple’s vintage logo (top), current (middle), and 2026 refresh (bottom). [Image: Keurig Dr Pepper] A return to Snapple’s quirky form Now, it seems, Keurig Dr Pepper is realizing that its rebrand may have been a bit too hasty. Looking back, some of these efforts, especially chasing multiple trends at once, left the brand feeling a bit fragmented, Dabrowski says. Snapples upcoming brand refresh spans graphics, logo, packaging communication, and bottle design. The bottles illustrations will call back to earlier iterations of Snapple with bolder colors and a slightly more retro look. Flavor signalers like Real Tea and Real Juice will take center stage on the packaging, connecting to the brands origins as a healthy beverage. And the sans serif logo will be replaced with a modernized version of the Snapple logo that defined the brand in the 90s. The new Snapple logo isnt a carbon copy of the one from the late 80s and early 2000s, but its very intentionally inspired by that era, Dabrowski says. We brought back the iconic racetrack shape and heritage cues people recognize, then refined them to work better on todays shelveswith clearer readability, bolder color, and stronger flavor storytelling. Marketing to match Snapple has also been slowly tapping back into its irreverent advertising roots. Last fall, the brand launched a new campaign called Snapsolutely Refreshing with a media buy in its NYC hometown, including out-of-home placements across subways, street panels, office elevators and Times Square. It ran a one-day bodega takeover featuring free Snapple and branded merch. For a limited time, the brand even brought back glass Snapple bottles at a few retailers across the city. And the ad accompanying Snapsolutely Refreshing feels charmingly similar to something Snapple might have made in its 90s underdog glory days: A man in an NYC bodega is confronted by a series of slightly creepy, talking wellness culture beverages, like kombucha and probiotic soda, before ultimately choosing to sip a Snapple instead. Still, for diehard Snapple fans, a key question remains: Will the glass bottle ever make a real comeback? That remains a bit of a mystery. Dabrowski says that in September, Snapple will roll out a new plastic bottle that mimics the originals shape and embossed logo. And, when pressed, a spokesperson shared that the brand is continuing to test glass bottles and learn from consumer response. Whether Snapple ever gets its snap back remains to be seenbut, for now, the brand is at least looking (and sounding) a little more like itself.
Category:
E-Commerce
With uncertainty as the new norm, leaders are understandably searching for psychological anchors. Theyre looking for ideas that can steady people and sustain energy through change. One of those anchors is hope. Across corporate mission statements, fresh publications from thought leaders, and HR manifestos, corporations have elevated hope from a state of being to a strategic imperative. But what happens when an emotion becomes a business model? How to define hope in an organizational context Psychologically, hope is a cognitive and motivational state defined by three elements: agency (belief in your capacity to shape outcomes), pathways (the ability to identify routes toward goals), and goals themselves. Psychologist C.R. Snyder conducted research in the 1990s that reframed hope as a measurable construct. Snyder correlated the concept with performance, well-being, and perseverance. Hopes modern strategic allure has deep cultural roots. In ancient philosophy, hope oscillated between virtue and vice. The Greeks saw it as both a comfort and a trap. When they opened Pandoras box, hope was the last thing left inside, which they ambiguously positioned between salvation and delusion. By the 20th century, hope became a secular virtue central to progress and humanism. In psychology, post-war theorists viewed hope as a coping mechanism that could inoculate individuals and societies against despair. More recently, the positive psychology movement of the early 2000s further codified hope as a measurable, trainable mindset. Today, in a world shaped by disruptiontechnological, social, and ecologicalhope has reemerged as a leadership commodity. In the absence of predictability, its a currency of cohesion. The upside of hope at work In organizational life, hope can offer the following tangible benefits: Motivational fuel: Hope maintains focus on goals when there are distant or ambiguous outcomes. Resilience amplifier: Employees with strong hope scores typically recover faster from setbacks and see alternative routes when plans fail. Cultural glue: Hope-based narratives can create psychological safety. This allows people to see themselves as coauthors of a positive future rather than passive recipients of corporate fate. Innovation driver: Hope enables experimentation by reframing failure as learning, not loss. In these ways, hope can act as a psychological lubricant, reducing the friction caused by doubt, fatigue, and fear. So why does hope in a corporate setting leave a bad taste in my mouth? Hopes hidden downsides Hopes fierce glow can be blinding. When hope decouples from reality, it risks morphing into delusion or denial. This is particularly dangerous in workplace cultures that prize positivity over honesty. Untampered, hope can produce three organizational distortions: Deferred reality: Leaders may avoid confronting hard truths, preferring to hope things improve. This delays critical decisions about restructuring, investment, or strategic pivoting. Toxic positivity: Teams pressured to stay hopeful may feel unable to surface legitimate concerns or dissenting views. The result is conformity disguised as belief. Chronic stress and burnout: Sustaining high levels of hope in the face of repeated setbacks can exhaust employees, which produces emotional dissonance when ones lived experience doesnt match the optimistic messaging. In essence, hope without realism becomes institutionalized avoidance. Why hope isnt strategic The current corporate positioning of hope as a strategy often stems from crisis communication. During market downturns, layoffs, or rapid transformation, hope becomes both a message and a salve. Yet, when you wield hope as a rhetoric rather than a practice, it erodes trust. Employees can sense when a message from leadership is inconsistent with conditions on the ground. The gap between them declaring hope and observable action breeds cynicism. This is a core component of workplace burnout, and a form of psychological corrosion that is far more damaging than pessimism. The case for realistic optimism A more sustainable alternative is realistic optimisma mindset that balances hopeful vision with clear assessment. Martin Seligman, one of positive psychologys founders, described optimism as the expectation that good things can happen, while realism ensures those expectations align with evidence and constraints. Realistic optimism doesnt deny difficulty: it contextualizes it. Leaders who embody realistic optimism model three habits: Evidence-based hope: They openly acknowledge setbacks and uncertainties while identifying genuine paths forward. Transparent communication: They link belief with action by showing how theyre addressing challenges, not merely stating that things will get better. Adaptive goal-setting: They recalibrate expectations when circumstances change, preserving motivation through clarity rather than blind positivity. For example, a startup facing funding shortfalls might cultivate realistic optimism by acknowledging fiscal pressure while outlining tangible cost-saving measures and revised growth trajectories. Realistic optimism transforms hope from sentiment into discipline. It requires intellectual honesty, emotional agility, and the courage to engage with uncertainty without succumbing to fantasy. In cultivating this balance, leaders create cultures that are not only hopeful, but credible. A quick guide to leading with realistic optimism If youre a leader and you want to know how to go about leading in a way that combines optimism and reality, start with the following steps below: Start with the facts. Before inspiring your team, ensure the data supports your message. Sustainable morale begins with credibility. Name the challenge, then the path. Hope grows when people see a route forward, not just a reason to believe. Pair optimism with concrete steps. Model uncertainty tolerance. Encourage dialogue about whats unclear. When leaders admit they dont have all the answers, hope becomes collective rather than performative. In an era when believing in better has become a hollow corporate refrain, leaders who master realistic optimism stand apart. They demonstrate that the most enduring form of hope is not a declaration, but a practice. And its one that they build with clarity, accountability, and shared ownership of reality.
Category:
E-Commerce
A CEO sits in a boardroom, staring at a strategy deck generated overnight by AI. The analysis is sharp. The recommendations are confident. The numbers line up. And yet something feels off. It feels flat, almost a little too perfect . . . This moment is becoming increasingly common for leaders. Artificial intelligence is now one of the most powerful management tools ever created. It can analyze markets in seconds, surface patterns no human team could find, and generate plans on demand. For many executives, AI already feels indispensable. But as intelligence scales at unprecedented speed, a quieter question is emerging inside organizations: How do we ensure AI is focused on human flourishing? Intelligence Is Scaling. Wisdom Is Not AI excels at intelligence. It detects patterns, predicts outcomes, and optimizes for efficiency. What it does not possess is contextual wisdom: the ability to understand why a decision matters, how it will land emotionally and culturally, or what it reinforces over time. Leadership has never been about having the most information. It has always been about deciding what matters when information conflicts. In an AI-rich environment, where intelligence is being commoditized, leaders face a subtle temptation to outsource judgement itself. When dashboards look precise and recommendations feel objective, optimization can easily be mistaken for wisdom. But AI cannot answer the questions leaders are increasingly accountable for: How is this affecting the precious humans in my care? What values are driving this decision? Is this decision indicative of the kind of world we are trying to build together? These are not computational questions. They are human ones. The Real Risk: Abdicated Leadership Much of the public conversation about AI risk focuses on bias or misuse. Those concerns are real. But inside organizations, a quieter risk is emerging: outsourcing thinking that affects humans to the machine. When leaders defer too often to AI-generated recommendations, they slowly lose confidence in their own judgment. Leadership shifts from sense-making to system-monitoring. Teams stop debating. Leaders stop interpreting reality and start validating outputs. The result isnt better leadership. Its thinner leadership. Over time, this shows up as cultural drift, ethical blind spots, employee disengagement, and loss of trustespecially during moments like layoffs, restructures, or major strategic shifts. When leaders cant clearly explain why a decision was made, people feel optimized instead of led. Strong leaders dont just decide what to do. They articulate why it matters. They connect decisions to shared meaning, values, and narrative. They help teams understand how todays choices fit into a longer human arc of transformation and evolution. AI can propose solutions. Only humans can author meaning. Why Clarity Is Becoming a Core Leadership Skill In an AI-saturated world, clarity is a force multiplier. Clarity about purpose.Clarity about values.Clarity about what not to optimize. Put simply: Clarity is deciding what you refuse to let AI optimize. AI will happily optimize for speed, efficiency, engagement, or cost reduction. It will not ask whether those optimizations erode trust, creativity, resilience, or long-term cohesion. Leaders must. This is why clarity, not charisma or technical expertise, is becoming one of the most critical leadership capabilities of the next decade. Clarity allows leaders to: Set boundaries around how and where AI is used Frame AI insights within human context Decide when efficiency should yield to ethics Protect creativity where optimization would flatten it Without clarity, leaders risk becoming reactive to machine intelligence instead of responsible for human outcomes. How Effective Leaders Use AI Without Becoming Dependent on It The goal is not to resist AI. It is to place AI correctly within leadership practice. Three principles can help leaders do that: Treat AI as an advisor, not an authority.Use AI to surface options, test assumptions, and explore scenariosbut make it explicit that final judgment remains human. In practice, this means leaders own decisions in their own words, not by pointing to an algorithm. Slow down at meaning-making moments.When decisions affect people, culture, or identity (hiring, layoffs, strategy shifts, values) pause. Ask not only What does the data suggest? but What does this decision communicate about who we are? Invest in judgment, not just AI literacy.AI skills matter. But judgment skills matter more. Organizations that thrive will be led by people trained to reason ethically, think systemically, and articulate values under pressurenot just operate tools efficiently. Meaning Is the Leadership Advantage AI Cant Touch In moments of uncertainty, people dont look to leaders for perfect predictions. They look for orientation. They want to know: What matters now? What should I focus on? How does my work connect to something meaningful? AI cannot provide that orientation. Leadership can. As machine intelligence accelerates, meaning potentially becomes more scarce and more valuable. Leaders who offer clarity amid complexity and purpose amid acceleration dont just build better cultures. They drive stronger innovation, greater organizational resilience, and long-term value creation. The Capability That Endures Every technological shift reshapes leadership. This one is no exception. But the core truth remains: leadership is not about knowing more. It is about seeing more clearly and exercising wisdom under pressure. AI will continue to evolve. Capabilities will expand. Tools will improve. What must deepen alongside them is human leaderships capacity for clarity, judgment, and meaning-making. Because in an AI world, the leaders who matter most wont be the ones who rely on the smartest machines. Theyll be the ones who remember in wisdom what it means to be human while using them.
Category:
E-Commerce
If you walk into a grocery store in the Netherlands or Germany, you might not realize youre being steered toward plant-based protein, from vegan tortellini to plant-based yogurt. But across Europe and the UK, major retailers are quietly driving that shift. And theyre seeing results at a time when plant-based sales are struggling in the US. Lidl, a budget supermarket, grew UK sales of its private-label plant-based line by nearly 700% from 2020 to 2025. In Germany, France, and Italy, plant-based retail sales are growing across multiple categories, with most of that growth coming from supermarkets own brands. Lidl is one of several retailers with a deliberate strategy to nudge consumers away from meat and dairy and toward plant-based food. In the Netherlands, major supermarkets now have an ambitious target: by 2030, they’re aiming for plant-based protein sales to outweigh animal-based food, in a 60-40 split. Meat (left) and plant-based meat (right) on display at a Lidl market. [Photo: Lidl] Climate is the biggest motivation. As grocery stores look at their own carbon footprintsdriven by policies like the EUs climate reporting rulesnearly all of the impact comes from food production in their supply chains. And nearly half of those emissions come from meat and dairy. Its hugethis is the biggest lever for a retailer in terms of reducing the climate impact, says Joanna Trewern, director of partnerships at ProVeg International, a Berlin-based nonprofit that advocates for grocery stores to prioritize plant-based protein. In the Netherlands, where stores have gone farthest to adopt new strategies, the organization co-founded a working group that helped retailers plan the transition. The Dutch government also issued a policy paper saying that the population was consuming more protein from animal sources than they should for a healthy dietthe opposite of the new dietary guidelines in the U.S. Stores have taken several steps to boost plant-based sales. First, since the cost of plant-based alternatives is still a barrier, theyve built up their own low-cost, private-label offerings. A core element of our strategy is ensuring that plantbased foods are just as affordable as animalbased alternatives, a spokesperson for Lidl Netherlands told Fast Company. At Lidl, the prices of our plantbased staple items are already equal to or even lower than their animalbased counterparts. This price parity ensures that cost is never a barrier for customers who want to make a more sustainable choice. Lower costs are critical for plant-based protein to grow, and private label products offer the biggest opportunity, Trewern says. “Retailers have more control over ingredient sourcing, it’s easiest for them to scale, and there’s more they can do in terms of price and investing in categories to bring the price down for the consumer,” she says. As plant-based sales have grown, Lidl keeps adding more products to its range. That includes more traditional plant-based protein, like tofu or chickpea-based products. The initial innovation in this space was very focused on convenienceproducts that really mimic meat, says Trewern. Now what were seeing is consumers are looking for something else. Thats led a lot of people to say plant-based is not doing well, the categorys failing. Actually, what were seeing now in many European countries is theyre starting to come back and the category is consolidating with a different type of product. More clean-label, whole-food product sales are going up massively. (Sales of tofu and tempeh are also growing in the U.S., though in both locations, they’re still a small fraction of overall plant-based meat.) [Photo: Lidl] Some stores are also offering new hybrid products. Lidl was the first to start selling a partly plant-based burger60% beef, 40% pea proteinthat tastes like beef but is priced lower than its regular ground beef and has a much lower carbon footprint. The store has also cut back on promotions on meat; twice a year, it makes sure its promotional flyers are meat-free and feature plant-based products instead. It’s also tested other strategies, like placing vegan meat next to animal-based products in the meat aisle. Partnerships with other brands can also help. The French retailer Carrefour worked with manufacturers like Danone and Unilever to bring new plant-based products to market, and met its original sales target seven years ahead of schedule. “Real behavior change happens when retailers and manufacturers work together to deliver products people love that reach price and taste parity with conventional options,” says Abby Sewell, corporate engagement manager at the Good Food Institute, an American nonprofit focused on the industry. The work can’t guarantee on its own that plant-based protein sales always growcountry-wide sales dipped in the Netherlands in 2024, for example, while some other markets expanded. But it’s a useful tool. In the U.S., supermarkets don’t yet have similar goals and strategies. And the growth of private-label brands offers more evidence that price is key. There’s still a large opportunity for more affordable, better-tasting products; almost three-quarters of American consumers are open to eating more plant-based food. “U.S. consumers say the most important factors that would make them more willing to eat plant-based meat are if it tasted better and was more affordable,” says Jody Kirchner, associate director of market insights at the Good Food Instiute. “This is an opportunity for the plant-based meat industry to continue to evolve and position itself for the next wave of growth.” “Weve seen this before with electric cars and solar panelsearly hype, a dip, then a return to growth,” Kirchner adds. “With the right investment and innovation, plant-based meat can find that same curve.”
Category:
E-Commerce
Corporate culture isnt built by policies. Its built by momentsthe unscripted experiences that catch us off guard, bring us closer, and quietly shape how we show up for one another. But many efforts labeled culture-building, including onboarding programs, leadership retreats, and all-hands meetings, still feel like productivity theater: tightly scheduled and heavy on performance. Today, its worth asking whether that model has simply run its course. Consider this: what if the future of culture-building isnt about managing people, but about designing experiences that allow people to feel something real together? What if awe, story, and shared creativity werent treated as indulgences, but as foundational elements of how trust, courage, and belonging actually form? Beyond the Mission Statement While leaders like to bring up the idea of team culture, few can describe what theirs feels like in practice. Thats because culture doesnt live in a mission statement or a values deck. It lives in the stories people tell when no one is watching. It lives in how they feel after a team gathering. It lives in the space between intention and lived experience. The data reinforces this gap. Deloitte reports that only 23% of organizations believe their employees are strongly aligned with corporate purpose. Gallup finds that just two in ten employees feel connected to their companys culture on a daily basis. These arent engagement or communication problems; they are failures of experience design. When culture is reduced to language and artifacts, it stays abstract. When its shaped through shared experience, it becomes something people carry with them. Designing a Culture People Can Actually Feel Imagine replacing a traditional all-hands meeting with a creative exercise in which each team member contributes a visual expression of what matters most to them at work. Or imagine a leadership offsite that trades breakout rooms for a story circle, where leaders share pivotal moments that shaped how they lead today. People may forget the fourth bullet on slide 37, but they remember the moment they felt genuinely seen. Thats where culture actually forms. Across my work with teams and leaders ranging from early-stage companies to established organizations navigating change, the most durable cultural shifts dont come from tighter processes or clearer messaging. They come from intentionally designed experiences built around three elements humans have relied on for connection long before modern organizations existed: art, ritual, and awe. These lay the grounds for emotional experienceswhich can determine trust, risk-taking, and follow-through. Art as a Medium for Meaning When teams create something togetherwithout relying on wordshierarchies soften, safety increases, and unspoken dynamics surface naturally. Art invites play and perspective, two capacities most workplaces quietly suppress. At a recent leadership offsite, I facilitated a collaborative art experience where each participant expressed a core value visually, without explanation. What emerged was more than a collective artwork; it was a shared mirror. People recognized one another in new ways. Long after the offsite ended, the exercise continued to shape conversations. Art creates space for truth to surface without requiring debate or performance. Ritual as Emotional Architecture Ritual has a way of slowing us down and signaling significance. Simple, intentional gesturesopening a meeting with a shared intention, closing an offsite with a moment of gratitude, marking transitions with presenceturn routine interactions into moments of coherence. In my Campfires of Connection work, gatherings begin and end with ritual: lighting a fire, sharing a single word, or pausing together in silence. These gestures dont demand belief or explanation; they communicate something more fundamental: this moment matters. One of my clients began opening weekly meetings with a 60-second pause and a single prompt: What are you bringing here today? Over time, that slight shift deepened trust more effectively than any formal team-building program. Ritual isnt soft; its the emotional structure. It creates the container in which change becomes possible. Awe as a Catalyst for Connection Modern workplaces are loud, fast, and cognitively overloaded. Many people arent disengaged because they dont care; theyre overstimulated and starved of wonder. Awe interrupts that pattern. It resets the nervous system and expands perspective. In one of my facilitation sessions, participants were invited to sketch places from their childhood and share the stories behind them. The drawings were simple and imperfect, yet deeply personal. As each was revealed, the room changed. Colleagues who had known one another only through polished professional roles suddenly encountered one another as whole people with layered histories. That collective pause created a sense of awe. These moments dont happen accidentally. Theyre carefully designed to allow people to encounter something beyond their roles. In environments driven by metrics and deadlines, awe reminds us why collaboration matters and why people choose to stay, contribute, and stretch together rather than simply comply. When Culture-Building Falls Flat To understand why this approach matters, it helps to consider the alternative. I once observed a leadership retreat that checked every conventional box. The agenda featured well-known speakers, the breakout sessions were smartly facilitated, and participants left entertained, informed, and exhausted. But within weeks, nothing had changed. The retreat generated momentum but not meaning. What was missing wasnt effort; it was emotional resonance. There was no moment when people could set aside the performance of leadership and engage with one another more honestly. The experience was efficient, but forgettable. Months later, a much smaller intervention with the same group, a single evening structured around reflection, had a disproportionate impact. Leaders spoke openly about uncertainty, named tensions they had been avoiding, and listened without trying to fix or impress. That evening reshaped how they worked together more than any previous retreat had. Culture doesnt shift because information is delivered; it shifts when people feel something together that changes how they see one another. For leaders designing their next team gathering, the most useful questions may not be logistical at all. What do we want people to feel when they leave this room? What truth needs space to surface here? What has been rushed past that deserves reverence? What might become possible if we slowed down just enough to let meaning catch up? The organizations people love working for arent those with the slickest branding or the most polished values decks. Theyre the ones where people leave a meeting or retreat feeling more alive, more trusted, and more willing to take risks together.
Category:
E-Commerce
Sites : [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] next »